Rasmus Lerdorf schrieb:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
The git and hg integration with svn is also good so any developer who
prefers to have a local repository can very easily use either git or
hg and easily merge into the central svn repository.
However I think we should provide the
the core developers have to make the
final decision. This process should be
an decision helper for all core developers who are undecided.
Sebastian
Lars Strojny schrieb:
Hi Sebastian,
Am Freitag, den 30.05.2008, 18:23 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Deutsch:
[...]
Nonetheless I feel
Johannes Schlüter schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 13:32 -0700, Chris Stockton wrote:
My only question, is what does PHP want. When I say PHP, of course I
am referring to the tens-of-thousands of users that make PHP a
success. Lets remember that random commenters which I would like to
refer to as
Philip Olson schrieb:
I also re-added the Discusssion on the Web section, because it
reflects what the user base is thinking on this topic.
This section of random blogs is unnecessary especially considering how
open the lists are to the world. I consider this section to be a bad If
I want my
I think a public voting system is not a good thing (though the idea
appealed me in the first place) - but I was convinced that it would lead
to vote without discussion.
For listening to the user base I originally had a headline Discussion
on the Web were I refered to some blog posts covering
Andi Gutmans schrieb:
Not sure we really reached a conclusion. I think it was inconclusive and people
got tired.
As I've stated in the past in general I don't like the ability to do things in
more than one way but in this case I think the advantages of the cleaner syntax
outweigh the fact
Stanislav Malyshev schrieb:
please add your votes
I'm +1.
BTW - how hard would it be to add voting interface to the wiki?
I don't think it's hard:
http://wiki.splitbrain.org/plugin:poll
http://wiki.splitbrain.org/plugin:userpoll
Sebastian
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
Hello,
I'm currently fooling around with the new namespaces feature. Is
there any (semi) official documentation when to use use or import.
use Foo;
Warning: The use statement with non-compound name 'Foo' has no effect
in. Is there any additional information.
cheers
*.sebastian
--
PHP
Hello,
that's it. Even
$b = new B;
$b-foo(); // echos B - good
works.
Thank you!
*.sebastian
Sebastian Deutsch schrieb:
Hello,
care... my case is slightly different. I was aware of that problem, but
in my case I call B::foo() from the main scope - it behaves right -
when I call
Hello,
care... my case is slightly different. I was aware of that problem, but
in my case I call B::foo() from the main scope - it behaves right -
when I call it within the scope of C (same call) it behaves different.
This is different as described in the bug. The same call should
have the same
();
}
}
B::foo(); // echos B - good
$c = new C;
$c-moo(); // echos C - wtf?? should be B
?
Is it a bug, or did I miss anything?
Sebastian Deutsch
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
();
}
}
foo::doit(); // with etiennes patch it will echo foo
?
Will they work together?
cheers
*.sebastian deutsch
Sara Golemon schrieb:
Attached is a patch which exports an internals hook in zend_class_entry
for fetching function pointers similar to the object hook get_method()
available to instance
hello,
is there a patch for the proposal out there? is anyone working on that
problem?
cheers
sebastian deutsch
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
13 matches
Mail list logo
