On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:38 AM Olle Härstedt
wrote:
> 2021-03-25 15:23 GMT+01:00, Christian Schneider :
> > Am 25.03.2021 um 14:29 schrieb Mark Randall :
> >> On 25/03/2021 09:28, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> >>> That's not quite what I meant. I meant that you can't say "capture by
> >>> default,
On 25/03/2021 16:24, Nuno Maduro wrote:
Concerning the comments about what's exactly "auto-captured" by the scope
of a multi-line short closure, we will be just reusing the "auto-capture"
feature that already exists in one-line short closures. Therefore, this RFC
doesn't have plans on changing
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 12:24, Nuno Maduro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Concerning the comments about what's exactly "auto-captured" by the scope
> of a multi-line short closure, we will be just reusing the "auto-capture"
> feature that already exists in one-line short closures. Therefore, this RFC
> doesn't
Hi,
Concerning the comments about what's exactly "auto-captured" by the scope
of a multi-line short closure, we will be just reusing the "auto-capture"
feature that already exists in one-line short closures. Therefore, this RFC
doesn't have plans on changing the way "auto-capture" already works
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 10:23, Christian Schneider
wrote:
> Am 25.03.2021 um 14:29 schrieb Mark Randall :
> > On 25/03/2021 09:28, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> >> That's not quite what I meant. I meant that you can't say "capture by
> default, but this variable is definitely local".
> >
> > I think if
2021-03-25 15:23 GMT+01:00, Christian Schneider :
> Am 25.03.2021 um 14:29 schrieb Mark Randall :
>> On 25/03/2021 09:28, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>>> That's not quite what I meant. I meant that you can't say "capture by
>>> default, but this variable is definitely local".
>>
>> I think if there's one
Am 25.03.2021 um 14:29 schrieb Mark Randall :
> On 25/03/2021 09:28, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>> That's not quite what I meant. I meant that you can't say "capture by
>> default, but this variable is definitely local".
>
> I think if there's one argument against, this would be it, but IMHO it is a
> On Mar 25, 2021, at 9:54 AM, Olle Härstedt wrote:
>
> 2021-03-25 14:29 GMT+01:00, Mark Randall :
>> On 25/03/2021 09:28, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>>> That's not quite what I meant. I meant that you can't say "capture by
>>> default, but this variable is definitely local".
>>
>> I think if there's
2021-03-25 14:29 GMT+01:00, Mark Randall :
> On 25/03/2021 09:28, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>> That's not quite what I meant. I meant that you can't say "capture by
>> default, but this variable is definitely local".
>
> I think if there's one argument against, this would be it, but IMHO it
> is a
On 25/03/2021 09:28, Rowan Tommins wrote:
That's not quite what I meant. I meant that you can't say "capture by
default, but this variable is definitely local".
I think if there's one argument against, this would be it, but IMHO it
is a weakness in PHP as a whole.
The solution would be
10 matches
Mail list logo
