*BUMP*
It would be really helpful if we could find consensus on this… I feel like the
RFC process is stalled until these questions are answered.
S
On 2011-06-27, at 9:06 PM, Sean Coates wrote:
The RFC was accepted.
Ok; so is this official now, or does it need to be ratified somehow?
If
hi Sean,
In any case I would do it anyway.
Whether it can make it to 5.4 or not is another question and I can't
give you an answer. But doing it anyway will finally clear this point.
We have to re do the short array syntax as well.
From my side it will be a -1 as I really don't think having
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi Sean,
In any case I would do it anyway.
Whether it can make it to 5.4 or not is another question and I can't
give you an answer. But doing it anyway will finally clear this point.
We have to re do the short array
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:15 -0400, Sean Coates wrote:
*BUMP*
It would be really helpful if we could find consensus on this… I feel like
the RFC process is stalled until these questions are answered.
I'm not the one who decides this. My personal opinion is that the rules
do not apply for
Hi,
the voting for the Voting RFC is closed.
Results can be found here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting/vote
The RFC was accepted.
David
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
The RFC was accepted.
Ok; so is this official now, or does it need to be ratified somehow?
If I clean up my RFC (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/objectarrayliterals) and put it
to vote, are these now the rules that will be followed?
Since I didn't use [RFC] in the original email to internals, do I
