- From: Gwynne Raskind
gwy...@darkrainfall.org
To: PHP internals internals@lists.php.net
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:20 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] A patch for HEAD
I've just finished making this patch for my own use (diffed against
5.3 CVS):
http://darkrainfall.org/php-5.3
To: PHP internals internals@lists.php.net
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:20 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] A patch for HEAD
I've just finished making this patch for my own use (diffed
against 5.3 CVS):
http://darkrainfall.org/php-5.3-shellbypass.patch
In short, what it does is make proc_open()'s
it.
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: Gwynne Raskind gwy...@darkrainfall.org
To: PHP internals internals@lists.php.net
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:20 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] A patch for HEAD
I've just finished making this patch for my own use (diffed against 5.3
CVS):
http
The idea is great. In fact this was in my todo list for php 5.3..
Please give me a few more days to review the patch.
Nuno
P.S.: you can add on more point to your list: you get to know the PID of the
exec'ed process instead of the PID of the shell.
- Original Message -
I've just
I've just finished making this patch for my own use (diffed against
5.3 CVS):
http://darkrainfall.org/php-5.3-shellbypass.patch
In short, what it does is make proc_open()'s shell_bypass option
available to UNIX systems. This is accomplished by allowing the
command parameter to proc_open()
Gwynne Raskind wrote:
I'm proposing the inclusion of this patch in HEAD (which I'll port it to
if I get a thumbs-up here), and possibly 5.3.2. Criticism and angry
flames welcome. Constructive critcism and good-natured comments will be
ignored ;) (just kidding... or am I?).
I'm fine with this
same here :)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Andrei Zmievskiand...@gravitonic.com wrote:
Gwynne Raskind wrote:
I'm proposing the inclusion of this patch in HEAD (which I'll port it to
if I get a thumbs-up here), and possibly 5.3.2. Criticism and angry flames
welcome. Constructive critcism
