On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, J. Adams wrote:
> I agree. VBulletin rules. It also permits voluntary participation rather than
> getting every email for ever conversation. Should you prefer to get everything
> via email, I believe it is possible to sync VBulletin with a mailing list.
If everybody would jus
I was really referring to another tool to collaborate on an RFC document,
something where comment threads can be started and replied to from within the
context/section of the RFC that the comment belongs to.
Ive looked at a few other wikis and some have this capability... Github could
be close
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Maciek Sokolewicz
wrote:
>
> NNTP works great! The only pain in the ass is that it's hellishly slow and
> very very often times out, making the reading of longer threads (like this
> one) take... ages...
> Perhaps it could be mirrored / load distributed as well? Da
On 17-10-2012 20:42, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Jeremiah Dodds
wrote:
That said, it's a little ridiculous to expect people to figure out a new
reader or whatever. Luckily, forums are jut a web version of
USENET. There are a few existing tools that take a mailing list a
Pierre Joye writes:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Jeremiah Dodds
> wrote:
>
>> That said, it's a little ridiculous to expect people to figure out a new
>> reader or whatever. Luckily, forums are jut a web version of
>> USENET. There are a few existing tools that take a mailing list and
>> m
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Jeremiah Dodds
wrote:
> That said, it's a little ridiculous to expect people to figure out a new
> reader or whatever. Luckily, forums are jut a web version of
> USENET. There are a few existing tools that take a mailing list and
> mirror it to a web-based forum a
On 17/10/12 11:43, Pierre Joye wrote:
> It is about hi jacking discussions with totally irrelevant topics,
> repetitive, nonconstructive posts in rows, in all possible ways.
The issue is that the proposed solution (a forum) does not solve
irrelevant topics being mixed into a discussion about a dif
(sorry if this is a double-post, I finger-fudged pretty hard)
Pierre Joye writes:
> hi,
>
> To all readers of this exact thread. No, we won't install a forum on
> php.net or nowhere else to discuss php.net issues. We have mailing
> lists, and it works well.
Just to throw in the opinion of some
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:43 AM
> To: Lester Caine
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Alternatives to mailing list?
>
> hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> > Clint Priest wrote:
> >>
> >>
hi,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Clint Priest wrote:
>>
>> I was thinking more along the lines of a collaborative wiki with
>> inline-threaded comments...
>
> Actually just using the wiki better would work, but it tends to get even
> more messy without someone moderatin
Clint Priest wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of a collaborative wiki with
inline-threaded comments...
Actually just using the wiki better would work, but it tends to get even more
messy without someone moderating everything.
I know people don't like my stance, but when one is suppo
hi,
To all readers of this exact thread. No, we won't install a forum on
php.net or nowhere else to discuss php.net issues. We have mailing
lists, and it works well.
We also do IRC discussions and post summaries here from time to time,
but that's somehow a personal matter.
Please keep focus on t
2 8:00 PM
> > To: internals@lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Alternatives to mailing list?
> >
> > Yahav Gindi Bar in php.internals (Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:18:12 +0300):
> > >I may sound old fashioned, but what about a forum?
>
>
I agree that having a foru
I was thinking more along the lines of a collaborative wiki with
inline-threaded comments...
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:00 PM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Alternatives
Yahav Gindi Bar in php.internals (Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:18:12 +0300):
>I may sound old fashioned, but what about a forum?
A forum is new fashioned. I am reading and writing this on news.php.net.
Webinterface: http://news.php.net/php.internals
But you'd better use a proper newsreader. Some browsers
Personally, I like IP.Board. Put that aside, I thought about PHPBB or
another open-source software :)
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:22 AM, J. Adams wrote:
> I agree. VBulletin rules. It also permits voluntary participation rather
> than getting every email for ever conversation. Should you prefer to
I agree. VBulletin rules. It also permits voluntary participation rather
than getting every email for ever conversation. Should you prefer to get
everything via email, I believe it is possible to sync VBulletin with a
mailing list.
On 10/16/2012 5:18 PM, Yahav Gindi Bar wrote:
I may sound ol
I may sound old fashioned, but what about a forum?
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Clint Priest wrote:
> Is it just me or has this Property Accessors chain of emails been
> impossible to make heads or tails of? People replying within replies
> within replies, quoting partial emails, cross-post
Is it just me or has this Property Accessors chain of emails been impossible to
make heads or tails of? People replying within replies within replies, quoting
partial emails, cross-posting and all sorts of chaos.
Would anyone be willing to entertain an alternative "communication method" with
s
19 matches
Mail list logo
