Hi internals,
For unrelated reasons detailed in
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/5951#issuecomment-670969676 ,
I'm not planning on continuing work on this due to issues I found thinking
about the proposal.
I initially started work on this because the intended behavior seemed
underspecified.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 2:22 AM tyson andre
wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> The match expression can be thought of as a much more concise/readable
> equivalent to chained ternary operators.
> I'm proposing allowing matches in constant expressions when all parts of
> the match are constant expressions.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 7:22 PM tyson andre
wrote:
> The match expression can be thought of as a much more concise/readable
> equivalent to chained ternary operators.
> I'm proposing allowing matches in constant expressions when all parts of
> the match are constant expressions.
>
>
That seems
On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 at 02:22, tyson andre wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> The match expression can be thought of as a much more concise/readable
> equivalent to chained ternary operators.
> I'm proposing allowing matches in constant expressions when all parts of
> the match are constant expressions.
>
Hi internals,
The match expression can be thought of as a much more concise/readable
equivalent to chained ternary operators.
I'm proposing allowing matches in constant expressions when all parts of the
match are constant expressions.
For example, these two class constants would have
