On 28.02.2008, at 15:19, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello David,
Wednesday, February 27, 2008, 9:27:16 PM, you wrote:
Greetings, PDO community! My name is David Sceppa and I am a program
manager working at Microsoft on improving SQL Server for PHP data
hosting.
Thanks fro writing and welcom
Hello David,
Wednesday, February 27, 2008, 9:27:16 PM, you wrote:
> Greetings, PDO community! My name is David Sceppa and I am a program
> manager working at Microsoft on improving SQL Server for PHP data hosting.
> Let me first just say that Microsoft is very interested in participating
> in
On Wednesday 27 February 2008, David Sceppa wrote:
> The approach that's been described in proposals (vendor-built drivers can
> be covered via CLAs while the core components remain CLA-free) is something
> I believe to be in the best interests of both driver writers and the
> developers who use P
Greetings, PDO community! My name is David Sceppa and I am a program manager
working at Microsoft on improving SQL Server for PHP data hosting.
Let me first just say that Microsoft is very interested in participating in the
PDO 2 effort and I plan to actively engage in the discussions of the s
Christopher Jones wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
> Perhaps if PDO actually added some value there there would not be a
> problem, but we still need something sensible wrapping it to make cross
> database SQL work so why do I need to bother changing the internals of
> what I have been working with
Lester Caine wrote:
> Perhaps if PDO actually added some value there there would not be a
> problem, but we still need something sensible wrapping it to make cross
> database SQL work so why do I need to bother changing the internals of
> what I have been working with for years just to 'fix half
Hi,
Pierre Joye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the biggest myths in this CLA discussion are:
>
>>> The main realization was that the vendors could not co-operate with
>>> each other on code without a CLA in place, and that some of them would
>>> not be able to co-operate with the community without a C
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> * Develop a PECL CLA that can optionally be used for PECL projects.
> * If necessary, adapt the PHP License, so that it works nicely
> together with the CLA.
> * The projects that want a CLA can choose between the PHP License or
> LGPL.
> * Change th
Steph Fox wrote:
Be fair, this is an open list. Anyone can join it, and it keeps the
noise levels down on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please? ;)
http://news.php.net/php.pdo
Move all of PDO over to there and let those of us who have not found any
reason to need to switch to it get on with fully open so
TED]>
Cc: "Steph Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 12:50 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2
Hello Wez,
keeping the discussion on this list is a major mistake. And it is
actually
the reason why everyone
Hi,
I think the biggest myths in this CLA discussion are:
> > The main realization was that the vendors could not co-operate with
> > each other on code without a CLA in place, and that some of them would
> > not be able to co-operate with the community without a CLA in place.
and:
> > For exam
Hello Wez,
keeping the discussion on this list is a major mistake. And it is actually
the reason why everyone outside this list is against it. And whether you
read blogs or not does not interest anybody at all - unless you are going to
comment on every single blog that mentions PHP and CLA. So f
12 matches
Mail list logo
