all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field and
a
CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move
as
much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can.
Hm but then when you checked out you'd have CLA'd stuff as well as normal
PECL stuff, as now. Don't
Hi,
On Feb 2, 2008 8:52 PM, Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field and
a
CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move
as
much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can.
There is no place for CLA in
Hello Pierre,
amen!, You're noted as no. But other people see a reason and continue to
discuss *please* without you. We will take your vote in as no when it comes
to voting if ever. If you are interested in explanations then I suggest you
read all mails and blogs again until you understand the
@lists.php.net
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2
Hello Steph,
you would not checkout php-default. That would only be used for release
management. Instead you would checkout php-src and whatever pecl modules
you
wanted, just as you
