I'm playing around with some syntactic sugar for PHP and when trying to
implement
:$foo
as equivalent for
'foo' => $foo
I ran into the problem of having only having one ast node but trying to use it
twice.
My first attempt was
| ':' T_VARIABLE
{ $$ =
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo,
SomeOther::Cool:Massive::awesome::space as bar, And::other:namespace
as foobar;
vs
use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo;
use
On Sunday 01 June 2008 23:32:58 Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I don't know what else I can say. You asked if someone had objections
and I replied stating my personal opinion that I find explicit use
statements in multiple lines more readable.
I don't really see the point in dropping three characters
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo,
SomeOther::Cool:Massive::awesome::space as bar, And::other:namespace
as foobar;
vs
use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as
Hi!
It's not dropping three characters, it's making better user experience.
I see lately on the list very strange total opposition to any feature
that adds any usability or syntax sugar to PHP. Like features supported
by a bunch of community people but opposed by some core developers on
hi,
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I wonder why is that?
Conservatism (and we are all conservative depending on what you ask...sadly)
What's wrong with being nicer to the user?
nothing
Is usability a taboo in PHP now?
no
+1 for this
Hi!
Attached is the patch that implements multiple elements in use
statement, like this:
use foo::bar as baz, foo::baz as bazbaz;
Any objections to it?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
: Sunday, June 01, 2008 6:09 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] multiple use
Hi!
Attached is the patch that implements multiple elements in use
statement, like this:
use foo::bar as baz, foo::baz as bazbaz;
Any objections to it?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Attached is the patch that implements multiple elements in use statement,
like this:
use foo::bar as baz, foo::baz as bazbaz;
Any objections to it?
Yes.
I find the whole namespace issue complicated enough as
Hi!
I find the whole namespace issue complicated enough as it is.
importing multiple namespaces and aliasing various
classess/functions all in one line decreases the readability imo.
I must say I fail to understand how it's decreasing readability. Is
function foo($a, $b, $c) hard to read? Is
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I find the whole namespace issue complicated enough as it is.
importing multiple namespaces and aliasing various
classess/functions all in one line decreases the readability imo.
I must say I fail to understand
Hi!
use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo,
SomeOther::Cool:Massive::awesome::space as bar, And::other:namespace
as foobar;
vs
use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo;
use SomeOther::Cool:Massive::awesome::space as bar;
use And::other:namespace as foobar;
Well, with (im)proper formatting many
From: Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Attached is the patch that implements multiple elements in use
statement, like this:
use foo::bar as baz, foo::baz as bazbaz;
Any objections to it?
A very nice addition. I have use for this.
Two thumbs up. :)
Best Regards
Mike Robinson
--
PHP
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo,
SomeOther::Cool:Massive::awesome::space as bar, And::other:namespace
as foobar;
vs
use FooBar::In::Some::NameSpace as foo;
use SomeOther::Cool:Massive::awesome::space as
14 matches
Mail list logo
