On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 08:35 +0100, Dolf Schimmel, TransIP wrote:
> They surely could. In fact that's how we've been doing it for a long
> time now. But they also want to lock down things as much as possible. In
> our case we decided to disallow PHP from doing any forking and put it in
> a (noexec)
> From: Ángel González
> On Sunday, February 28, 2016 21:12, Ángel González wrote:
> I don't think more than a direct SMTP transport will be needed (LMTP
> perhaps?), but it seems a good idea that #29629 can finally be fixed.
>
These would indeed be a few examples. Although