Re: Fw: [PHP-DEV] RFC Proposal: Pluggable Mail Transports

2016-03-11 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 08:35 +0100, Dolf Schimmel, TransIP wrote: > They surely could. In fact that's how we've been doing it for a long > time now. But they also want to lock down things as much as possible. In > our case we decided to disallow PHP from doing any forking and put it in > a (noexec)

Re: Fw: [PHP-DEV] RFC Proposal: Pluggable Mail Transports

2016-03-10 Thread Dolf Schimmel, TransIP
> From: Ángel González > On Sunday, February 28, 2016 21:12, Ángel González wrote: > I don't think more than a direct SMTP transport will be needed (LMTP > perhaps?), but it seems a good idea that #29629 can finally be fixed. > These would indeed be a few examples. Although