Hi Maciej,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Maciej Sobaczewski
wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> so... fgetss(). We have such a beautiful function in PHP. As it's
> described in the manual: "Get line from file pointer and strip HTML tags".
> I'm wondering if it has any differences/advantages over using
Hello Tjerk,
thanks for the explanation. This is close to what I thought. So, if
there is a difference, I see no point in proposing to remove it. You can
consider this thread as closed ;)
Have a nice day,
Maciej.
Hi Maciej,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Maciej Sobaczewski
wrote:
Hel
Hi!
> What I found *not safe*, throwing unwanted warnings hitting an
> undesired behavior, or even segfaulting, and thus needing patch :
> - Dom
> - Mysqli
> - sqlite3 (sqlite3stmt class segfaults)
I've fixed all the instances of problematic behavior with no ctor that I
could catch now. I could
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Stas Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > What I found *not safe*, throwing unwanted warnings hitting an
> > undesired behavior, or even segfaulting, and thus needing patch :
> > - Dom
> > - Mysqli
> > - sqlite3 (sqlite3stmt class segfaults)
>
> I've fixed all the instanc
Hi, Nikita
That's right, but the link, Ferenc Kovacs provided, should be added to that
list, and this list should be linked on the php.net website on the page
"Getting involved" if you ask me.
Bye,
Simon
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:43 PM, S
PHP language spec
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
VCS Account Approved: fredemmott approved by bjori \o/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 23 Jul 2014, at 14:38, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> My sincerest apologies about all the mess earlier and the delay. Both me and
> Zeev are happy enough with the RFC, so the voting for this RFC has started
> (again). It shall end on 2014-07-30 (next Wednesday, a week’s time) and it
> won’t be ca
Good evening,
The intdiv RFC is put to the vote, with separate votes for the integer division
operator (%%) and intdiv function, the latter as a fallback. I would highly
encourage you to read the discussion in the “[RFC] intdiv()” thread and the
whole RFC before voting.
The vote is here: https
Hi all,
Current Zend hash uses ulong for numeric array indexes.
This causes bug #67693
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67693
Signed/unsigned mismatch is the root cause of this bug.
Since PHP's int is signed by default, it might be better
to change Zend hash index to signed long.
I would like to
On 30 Jul 2014, at 03:37, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Current Zend hash uses ulong for numeric array indexes.
> This causes bug #67693
>
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67693
>
> Signed/unsigned mismatch is the root cause of this bug.
> Since PHP's int is signed by default, it might be better
> to
Hi Andrey,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrey Andreev wrote:
> This would be a major BC break, that couldn't possibly happen in PHP
> 5.x and IMO is way too radical even for PHP 6/7.
>
It wouldn't be major BC, but minor.
Most compatible way is to allow namespace alias to \ (root) and simp
Hi Ferenc,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> namespaces has a bit clunky way of supporting constants: define always
> assumes global ns(and the const syntax only allows scalar values so it
> isn't always an option to use const).
define() is problem because it's an excepti
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Current Zend hash uses ulong for numeric array indexes.
> This causes bug #67693
>
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67693
>
> Signed/unsigned mismatch is the root cause of this bug.
> Since PHP's int is signed by default,
> On July 30, 2014 at 6:01 AM Tjerk Meesters wrote:
>
>
> Instead of doing that, why not simply disallow negative array indices to be
> used as integers?
>
> In other words, negative indices are treated as if you had used strings so
> that it doesn't upset the the last numeric index kept in t
On 30 Jul, 2014, at 1:48 pm, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>
>> On July 30, 2014 at 6:01 AM Tjerk Meesters wrote:
>>
>>
>> Instead of doing that, why not simply disallow negative array indices to be
>> used as integers?
>>
>> In other words, negative indices are treated as if you had used strings
16 matches
Mail list logo
