[PHP-DEV] Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2015-12-09

Results for project PHP master, build date 2015-12-09 07:26:46+02:00 commit: 245a8c3cdf7ea0654667c1470a742a7354a0c147 revision date: 2015-12-09 12:18:25+08:00 environment:Haswell-EP cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2, LLC 45 MB

Re: [PHP-DEV] Practical comparisons on PHP7

Jefferson Gonzalez wrote on 09/12/2015 03:48: So as somebody already said, maybe your code or setup is really busted. Really busted, or spending all its time in a type of operation that ZE3 can't particularly optimize... -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To

[PHP-DEV] help applying security fixes to 7.0.1 and 5.5 branches

Hi, I just fixed two security related bugs in sapi/litespeed, #70758 #70759. Can someone help applying the fix to 7.0.1 and 5.5 branches? Thanks, George Wang -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Practical comparisons on PHP7

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Jefferson Gonzalez wrote: > On 12/08/2015 08:32 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > >> On 08/12/15 02:23, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> >>> Ah, I just checked. You have no opcache at all in your PHP 7 setup. And >>> you have eaccelerator configured for PHP 5.

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline

Frankly, I think the LTS distros that include PHP 5.6 will be plenty — as we've seen with 5.3, it has been maintained with back ports long after the official EOL. People either understand what they're getting into when making these choices, or they don't and they don't care anyway. I'd vote +1

Re: [PHP-DEV] Practical comparisons on PHP7

On 09/12/15 16:24, Rowan Collins wrote: >> So as somebody already said, maybe your code or setup is really busted. > > Really busted, or spending all its time in a type of operation that ZE3 > can't particularly optimize... But I'd like to understand why what is fairly simple PHP code is

Re: [PHP-DEV] Practical comparisons on PHP7

Then do a trace with xhprof/xdebug/blackfire and see where the time is spent. How should we magically know the answers? > On 09.12.2015, at 20:02, Lester Caine wrote: > > On 09/12/15 16:24, Rowan Collins wrote: >>> So as somebody already said, maybe your code or setup is

[PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Add HTTP/2 Server Push Support to ext/curl

Hey folks, It's been 3 weeks since I first put this up on the ML and there has been no changes proposed, so I'm moving forward with a vote. It's a simple Yes/No 50%+1 majority required as it's not a language change. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/curl_http2_push#vote Voting will end in 2 weeks,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Who's maintaining phar ?

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 2:54 AM, François Laupretre > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The question is in the subject. Is someone currently responsible for phar > > maintenance and evolution ? > > > > From what I

[PHP-DEV] Wiki RFC karma request: mdwheele

Hi, I have recently continued a discussion to implement class friendship for PHP. I would like to suggest an implementation of this feature and discussion has gotten to the point that regular feedback can be applied to a draft RFC and move the conversation forward. I am registered on the wiki

Re: [PHP-DEV] Class Friendship in PHP

Thank you very much for the comments, François. On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:01 AM, wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for this interesting and well-documented message. > > When looking at the history about class friendship, you may have seen that > the concept was globally rejected in

Re: [PHP-DEV] Practical comparisons on PHP7

Lester, On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > On 09/12/15 16:24, Rowan Collins wrote: > >> So as somebody already said, maybe your code or setup is really busted. > > > > Really busted, or spending all its time in a type of operation that ZE3 > > can't