> We should be deprecating this alternative syntax instead of recommending
> its use. I was under the impression that we *were* already discouraging its
> use and it has already been temporarily deprecated.
I agree with Nikita. I think we should be deprecating and removing
`{}` access in favor of
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:34:21 +, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi Sara,
>
> Sara Golemon wrote:
>> Patricio Tarantino has asked me to help him propose Operator
>> Overloading in PHP 7.1 (based in part on my operator extension in
>> PECL). I think we can expose this to usespace as magic methods with
Hi!
> I strongly disagree with this. $str[$offset] is well-recognized,
> generally understood syntax that does not require familiarity with
> language peculiarities. $str{$offset} might be clear to a Perl
> programmer, but to anyone else this is just guesswork, with a typo being
> a reasonable
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Coakley wrote:
It looks like I'm late to the party for this discussion, but I feel like
this is a similar concept to the already existing Comparable RFC , which in my opinion, has a much better
interface. Is this slightly more in-line with what you're thinking with
type
Den 2016-02-01 kl. 22:06, skrev Stanislav Malyshev:
> Hi!
>
>> I strongly disagree with this. $str[$offset] is well-recognized,
>> generally understood syntax that does not require familiarity with
>> language peculiarities. $str{$offset} might be clear to a Perl
>> programmer, but to anyone else
Hi everyone,
There is one unresolved issue with the current patch that the RFC
doesn't address, so I'll ask about it here.
As part of supporting exponent notation in all remaining integer
operations (casts, operators), I would like to have intval() support it,
to match the `(int)` cast.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> The only concern I have is that support of negative indexing will break
>> symmetry with (proper) arrays, where we cannot support negative indexing.
>
> I think that was the main source of objections to
Hi Dmitry,
Many thanks for the comments.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 10:23 AM
> To: Anatol Belski ; internals@lists.php.net
> Cc: 'Pierre Joye' ; 'Xinchen Hui'
>
Hi,
At current state, I see this not as a whole stream layer refactoring,
but as a low-level replacement of POSIX layer on Windows.
I see only few "visible" changes:
1. The layer first checks, if file names are valid UTF-8 strings, and
use UTF-8 names or fall back to system locale.
2. The
Le 31/01/2016 23:14, Stanislav Malyshev a écrit :
Hi!
The only concern I have is that support of negative indexing will break
symmetry with (proper) arrays, where we cannot support negative indexing.
I think that was the main source of objections to this proposal in the
past. However, as one
I am just looking for tutorials on developing a computer language. Every
part of developing a computer language.
I am also looking for tutorials on writing wrappers for php, like opengl,
alsa, jack, ladspa, gtk, wx,etcetera.
The more tutorials you post the more it will help development. If you
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The only concern I have is that support of negative indexing will break
> > symmetry with (proper) arrays, where we cannot support negative indexing.
>
> I think that was the main source of objections to
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Anatol Belski [mailto:anatol@belski.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 11:03 AM
> To: 'Dmitry Stogov' ; internals@lists.php.net
> Cc: 'Pierre Joye' ; 'Xinchen Hui'
> ; 'Nikita Popov'
Results for project PHP master, build date 2016-02-01 06:29:53+02:00
commit: 678300a
previous commit:1b36037
revision date: 2016-01-31 18:14:37+00:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
14 matches
Mail list logo