On 06.09.21 17:28, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals,
In the thread for deprecation of dynamic properties, Rowan suggested that
we alias "stdClass" to "DynamicObject" in
https://externals.io/message/115800#115802. I wanted to split this
discussion off into a separate thread, as this can be
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021, at 4:22 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 6:50 PM Kamil Tekiela wrote:
>
> > Hi Nikita,
> >
> > I think this might be a good idea, but I would like to propose yet another
> > variant.
> > Replace stdClass with DynamicObject and keep stdClass as an alias. It
Hi Marc,
The name seems to be ok IMHO. Even though it is a class, the main use case
is to denote an object that was created dynamically rather than through an
instantiation of a class. And I know that a lot of usage comes from people
directly creating new instances of stdClass but if you do that
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:29 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> Hi internals,
>
> In the thread for deprecation of dynamic properties, Rowan suggested that
> we alias "stdClass" to "DynamicObject" in
> https://externals.io/message/115800#115802. I wanted to split this
> discussion off into a separate
Hello internals,
The function array_column() would be much more useful if there was an
option to preserve the original array keys.
I can create an RFC, but I think it is better to first discuss the options.
This is requested in different places on the web, e.g.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 7:10 PM Kevin Lyda wrote:
> [sent a second time, now to the list, sorry]
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 3:53 PM Christian Schneider
> wrote:
> > How can you say "it never was a problem" if we never had to live without
> stat cache?
> > Can you back up that claim with numbers?
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:57 PM Marc wrote:
>
> On 9/2/21 5:10 PM, Go Kudo wrote:
> > Hi Internals.
> >
> > Expanded from the previous RFC and changed it to an RFC that organizes
> the
> > whole PHP random number generator. Also, the target version has been
> > changed to 8.2.
> >
> >
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:10 PM Go Kudo wrote:
> Hi Internals.
>
> Expanded from the previous RFC and changed it to an RFC that organizes the
> whole PHP random number generator. Also, the target version has been
> changed to 8.2.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension
>
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 6:50 PM Kamil Tekiela wrote:
> Hi Nikita,
>
> I think this might be a good idea, but I would like to propose yet another
> variant.
> Replace stdClass with DynamicObject and keep stdClass as an alias. It can
> be deprecated in 8.3.
> If we only add an alias, I am afraid
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 19:59, Craig Francis
wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 19:14, Craig Francis
> wrote:
>
>> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal for the
>> is-literal function.
>>
>
> This RFC has been rejected; with 10 votes in favour, and 23 against.
> [...]
> And
> It would be great if someone on
Windows and macos could repeat this experiment
I ran this on Windows and I got the following results:
Native Windows build:
Without cache
real0m31.170s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
With cache
real0m0.694s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
Ubuntu
It's WSL2
uname -r
5.4.72-microsoft-standard-WSL2
Hi Nikita,
wt., 7 wrz 2021 o 12:29 Nikita Popov napisał(a):
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to pick up a loose thread from the future scope of the
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_return_type RFC, the $this return type for
> fluent APIs:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/this_return_type
>
> I have
Hi internals,
I'd like to pick up a loose thread from the future scope of the
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_return_type RFC, the $this return type for
fluent APIs:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/this_return_type
I have some reservations about this (which basically come down to $this not
being a
WSL1 or WSL2? afaik they have significant performance differences, and we
should only consider WSL2 as WSL1 is being deprecated afaik
On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 12:31, Kamil Tekiela wrote:
> > It would be great if someone on
> Windows and macos could repeat this experiment
>
> I ran this on Windows
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021, 5:49 PM Kamil Tekiela wrote:
> It's WSL2
> uname -r
> 5.4.72-microsoft-standard-WSL2
>
no need to test on wsl2, that's a dockerized linux.
best,
Pierre
>
Hey Nikita
On 07.09.21 12:28, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals,
I'd like to pick up a loose thread from the future scope of the
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_return_type RFC, the $this return type for
fluent APIs:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/this_return_type
I have some reservations about
On 07.09.2021 at 15:02, Andreas Heigl wrote:
> On 07.09.21 12:28, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
>> I'd like to pick up a loose thread from the future scope of the
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_return_type RFC, the $this return type
>> for
>> fluent APIs:
>>
>>
Am 07.09.2021 um 12:28 schrieb Nikita Popov:
I have some reservations about this (which basically come down to $this not
being a proper "type", so should it be in the type system?) but I can see
the practical usefulness, so I think it's worth discussing this.
I am not conviced that there is
19 matches
Mail list logo
