Hi,
I have given you ZE karma. Please commit this yourself no later than
Tuesday evening!
Thanks done.
Regards,
Christian
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 02.12.2008 19:49, Christian Seiler wrote:
Hi,
I have given you ZE karma. Please commit this yourself no later than
Tuesday evening!
Thanks done.
Thanks to you! =)
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
On 29.11.2008, at 03:02, Christian Seiler wrote:
PHP 5.3, ZE2 FPU precision:
http://www.christian-seiler.de/temp/php/2008-11-28-fpu+rounding/php53-fpu.patch
PHP 5.3, round() behaviour:
http://www.christian-seiler.de/temp/php/2008-11-28-fpu+rounding/php53-round.patch
PHP 6, ZE2 FPU precision:
Hi Lukas,
First of all, @all: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/rounding - I didn't have
time to update it yet but the basically nothing has changed except for
implementation details wrt. FPU precision. For FPU precision
explanations see (*).
Anyways, a few items from the top of my head that I know
Hi Marcus,
On 26 Nov 2008, at 19:45, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 8:33:59 PM, you wrote:
On 26 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Stanislav,
why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash?
Wednesday, November
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 22.11.2008, at 14:52, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Work is still going on to finalize the namespace changes. I am not
sure when this will be done, I am sort of hoping Monday. Then we can
freeze Tuesday and release on Thursday if all goes well.
The good news,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22.11.2008, at 14:52, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Work is still going on to finalize the namespace changes. I am not sure
when this will be done, I am sort of hoping Monday. Then we can freeze
Tuesday and release on
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 19:36 +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
Following files are still not converted to the new parameter parsing API:
- ext/mysql/php_mysql.c
That's mostly done, some small issues left, will commit before alpha ...
- ext/mysqli/mysqli_embedded.c
That's not done yet, but only
Em Qua, 2008-11-26 às 19:36 +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin escreveu:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22.11.2008, at 14:52, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Work is still going on to finalize the namespace changes. I am not sure
when this will be done, I
On 26.11.2008, at 11:21, Scott MacVicar wrote:
Independent of that I need someone to handle the move of ext/mhash
to PECL.
Why not just delete the extension? There isn't anything valuable in
there as it just wraps around hash now, it is literally an empty
module
and a configure
Hi!
Then again, we maintain BC aside from this single call to determine if
the extension is loaded, so I guess yeah .. lets just remove it .. we
are expecting people to update their code.
If we have function-level BC - why not just add stub extension with
dependency on hash?
--
Stanislav
Hello Stanislav,
why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash?
Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 7:06:03 PM, you wrote:
Hi!
Then again, we maintain BC aside from this single call to determine if
the extension is loaded, so I guess yeah .. lets just remove it .. we
are
Hi!
why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash?
Would be fine too, if loading can handle that correctly.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
On 26 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Stanislav,
why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash?
Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 7:06:03 PM, you wrote:
Hi!
Then again, we maintain BC aside from this single call to
determine if
the extension is
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 20:21, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash?
Would be fine too, if loading can handle that correctly.
Don't we do that already?
What exactly was the vote from last week about? I thought it was about
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 8:33:59 PM, you wrote:
On 26 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Stanislav,
why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash?
Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 7:06:03 PM, you wrote:
Hi!
Then again, we
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's one solution, the other is to reqister that stub extension from
MINIT of the hash extension and be done (can all be done in hash.c).
It was what we decided weeks ago already. I'mm not sure why it is not done
On 22.11.2008, at 14:52, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Work is still going on to finalize the namespace changes. I am not
sure when this will be done, I am sort of hoping Monday. Then we can
freeze Tuesday and release on Thursday if all goes well.
The good news, namespace changes are now
Hi,
Work is still going on to finalize the namespace changes. I am not
sure when this will be done, I am sort of hoping Monday. Then we can
freeze Tuesday and release on Thursday if all goes well.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
19 matches
Mail list logo
