Hi Nikita,
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:49 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail is going to both the systems group and internals mailing list.
>
> I would like to request a mailing list suspension for the users
> tonymars...@hotmail.com and li...@rhsoft.net, who have
On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 11:17:53 AM CST Michael Morris wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Chase Peeler wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:49 AM Paul Jones wrote:
> > > > On Jan 2, 2018, at 12:29, Dustin Wheeler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> On Di, 2018-01-02 at 11:49 +0100, Nikita Popov wrote:
>> li...@rhsoft.net, who have recently been
>> aggressively derailing
>
> He was blocked in 2012 already:
>
> https://externals.io/message/59395#59421
I hadn't
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 12:59 PM, Joe Watkins wrote:
>
> The precedent has been set already: One of these users was already kicked
> off the list and decided to resubscribe and continue to conduct themselves
> in an unacceptable manner.
>
> This is a forum for technical
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Chase Peeler wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:16 AM Andrey Andreev wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Chase Peeler
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I agree with Paul. It would be
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 12:59, Joe Watkins wrote:
>
> Let's remember that there are a large number of people on the sidelines that
> are not subscribed to the list directly, but choose to use news readers, or
> the excellent externals.io; They may not able to filter
The precedent has been set already: One of these users was already kicked
off the list and decided to resubscribe and continue to conduct themselves
in an unacceptable manner.
This is a forum for technical discussion regarding the development of PHP:
We must be able to keep conversation focused
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 12:35, Joe Watkins wrote:
>
> You don't get to conduct yourself however you want without consequence.
Sure. The question then, is, what is the proper consequence? I hold that it is
not "banning" or "suspension" (which may or may not actually be
+1
It's true that everyone can setup their own filters, but why should they
have too.
You don't get to conduct yourself however you want without consequence.
Cheers
Joe
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Rowan Collins
wrote:
> On 3 January 2018 at 17:28, Chase Peeler
On 3 January 2018 at 17:28, Chase Peeler wrote:
> I think self moderation still solves this. If the person is disruptive
> enough, eventually enough people will block them and there won't be many
> instances of them getting quoted or poisoning the thread.
>
> If certain
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:18 PM Michael Morris wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Chase Peeler
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:49 AM Paul Jones wrote:
> > > > On Jan 2, 2018, at 12:29, Dustin Wheeler
What personal attack did I make? I asked a serious question. The fact that
you could even take a serious question and interpret it as a personal
attack is exactly why I am very wary of any attempts to suspend users. It's
too easy to misunderstand what someone says.
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:16 PM
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Chase Peeler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:49 AM Paul Jones wrote:
> > > On Jan 2, 2018, at 12:29, Dustin Wheeler wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Levi Morrison
On 3 Jan 2018 18:13, "Chase Peeler" wrote:
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:16 AM Andrey Andreev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Chase Peeler
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Paul. It would be different if email clients
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:16 AM Andrey Andreev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Chase Peeler
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Paul. It would be different if email clients that allowed
> > filtering were expensive or hard to find. They
On 3 January 2018 at 15:49, Paul Jones wrote:
>
> I am not in favor of anyone else deciding for me that I am not allowed to
> see Tony's (or anyone else's) messages on this list. I can make that
> decision myself, and revisit that decision myself should I choose.
>
> If
On Di, 2018-01-02 at 11:49 +0100, Nikita Popov wrote:
> li...@rhsoft.net, who have recently been
> aggressively derailing
He was blocked in 2012 already:
https://externals.io/message/59395#59421
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Chase Peeler wrote:
>
> I agree with Paul. It would be different if email clients that allowed
> filtering were expensive or hard to find. They aren’t, though. Pretty much
> every email client not only allows filtering, but rather
Am 03.01.18 um 10:55 schrieb Sanford Whiteman:
> Tony, you have a point in the sense that a proposed Code of Conduct --
> which would have been binding on posts to lists @php.net -- provoked a
> fiery debate (to put it mildly) and was eventually withdrawn
>
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:49 AM Paul Jones wrote:
>
> > On Jan 2, 2018, at 12:29, Dustin Wheeler wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> >>
> >> I doubt we have any official procedures. I agree with the
> On Jan 2, 2018, at 12:29, Dustin Wheeler wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>>
>> I doubt we have any official procedures. I agree with the proposed
>> suspension as long as the suspension for a set amount of time; I
>> believe
Tony, you have a point in the sense that a proposed Code of Conduct --
which would have been binding on posts to lists @php.net -- provoked a
fiery debate (to put it mildly) and was eventually withdrawn
(http://news.php.net/php.internals/90726).
The dominant objections to the CoC
"Stanislav Malyshev" wrote in message
news:cc1f4670-d201-5a06-7309-a2386f819...@gmail.com...
Hi!
You may not like what I have to say, but that is no reason to ban me
from saying it. I believe in democracy and free speech, and by banning
or suspending me you are effectively banning the right
Hi!
> You may not like what I have to say, but that is no reason to ban me
> from saying it. I believe in democracy and free speech, and by banning
> or suspending me you are effectively banning the right to free speech.
This has nothing to do with free speech. You are welcome to exercise
your
"Thomas Punt" wrote in message
news:am4pr0901mb1265e675e7965065989892e5f9...@am4pr0901mb1265.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com...
Hi!
Hi,
This mail is going to both the systems group and internals mailing list.
I would like to request a mailing list suspension for the users
tonymars...@hotmail.com
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>
> I doubt we have any official procedures. I agree with the proposed
> suspension as long as the suspension for a set amount of time; I
> believe in giving people a chance to reform. If they can't reform...
> well then I'm
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail is going to both the systems group and internals mailing list.
>
> I would like to request a mailing list suspension for the users
> tonymars...@hotmail.com and li...@rhsoft.net, who have recently been
>
Hi Nikita
2018-01-02 11:49 GMT+01:00 Nikita Popov :
> Hi,
>
> This mail is going to both the systems group and internals mailing list.
>
> I would like to request a mailing list suspension for the users
> tonymars...@hotmail.com and li...@rhsoft.net, who have recently been
>
Am 02.01.2018 um 11:49 schrieb Nikita Popov:
> I would like to request a mailing list suspension for the users
> tonymars...@hotmail.com and li...@rhsoft.net, who have recently been
> aggressively derailing the "Scalar Pseudo-type" thread, despite requests to
> moderate their participation both in
Hi!
> Hi,
>
> This mail is going to both the systems group and internals mailing list.
>
> I would like to request a mailing list suspension for the users
> tonymars...@hotmail.com and li...@rhsoft.net, who have recently been
> aggressively derailing the "Scalar Pseudo-type" thread, despite
30 matches
Mail list logo