On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 03:21:18PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
Shuah Khan (2):
iommu: Add iommu_error class event to iommu trace
iommu: Change iommu driver to call io_page_fault trace event
Applied to the tracing branch, thanks Shuah.
___
iommu
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:40:48AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:06:58PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
With the right (or wrong;-) definition of v1 SMMU node in DTB it is
possible to trigger a division by zero in arm_smmu_init_domain_context
(if number of context
The function msm_iommu_get_ctx() is needed buy the MSM-GPU
driver with and wiithout IOMMU compiled in. Make the
function available when no IOMMU driver is there.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org
---
drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.h |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git
The include file has been removed and the file does not
need it anyway, so remove it. Fixes a compile error.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c |2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:42:18AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:07:00PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
arm-smmu= arm-smmu driver option
off Disable arm-smmu driver (ie. ignore available SMMUs)
force_isolation
Try to attach each
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 09:59:00PM -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
I *hate* the bizarre calling convention for iommu_unmap(). Is it
actually clearly documented anywhere? Why on earth is it not just
returning void, and expected to unmap what it was *asked* to unmap?
Yeah, I agree that this should
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:42:18PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:07:00PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
+__setup(arm-smmu, arm_smmu_parse_options);
If this is going to be a common function for IOMMUs, let's instead move the
command-line parsing out into the generic
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:54 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 09:59:00PM -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
I *hate* the bizarre calling convention for iommu_unmap(). Is it
actually clearly documented anywhere? Why on earth is it not just
returning void, and expected to unmap
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 12:59 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 12:59 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
This api return the iommu domain to which the device is attached.
The iommu_domain is required for making API calls related to iommu.
Follow up patches which use this API to know iommu maping.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:32:47PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:42:52AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:07:01PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann andreas.herrm...@calxeda.com
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c |
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:54 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 09:59:00PM -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
I *hate* the bizarre calling convention for iommu_unmap(). Is it
actually clearly documented anywhere? Why on earth is it not just
returning void, and expected to unmap
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:07:20PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:34:57AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:06:56PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
Currently it is derived from smmu resource size. If the resource size
is wrongly specified (e.g.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:05:13PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:54 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Yeah, I agree that this should be documented since it is quite
non-standard/non-obvious behaviour of a function. The reason the
interface was implemented this way is that
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:54 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 09:59:00PM -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
I *hate* the bizarre calling convention for iommu_unmap(). Is it
actually clearly documented anywhere? Why on
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 11:36 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Why would it ever care? If it *happens* to map something that can use
large pages, yay!. If it subsequently breaks apart those large pages by
unmapping 4KiB in the middle, let
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 12:59 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
This patch adds vfio iommu support for Freescale IOMMU
(PAMU - Peripheral Access Management Unit).
The Freescale PAMU is an aperture-based IOMMU with the following
characteristics. Each device has an entry in a table in memory
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 19:52 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 11:36 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Why would it ever care? If it *happens* to map something that can use
large pages, yay!. If it subsequently breaks
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 13:44 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 19:52 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 11:36 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Why would it ever care? If it *happens* to map something
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 21:11 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 13:44 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 19:52 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 11:36 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:05 +0100, David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 15:46 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 21:11 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I wouldn't bother to go looking for opportunities to use super pages if
we remove the last non-SP-capable IOMMU from the domain.
I predict bugs getting filed if a guest sees
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 23:15 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 15:46 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 21:11 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I wouldn't bother to go looking for opportunities to use super pages if
we remove the last non-SP-capable IOMMU
Joerg,
Thank you for reviewing this patch.
ZhenHua
On 09/24/2013 07:05 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 04:38:29PM +0800, ZhenHua wrote:
Hi Guys,
Though DMAR_ICS_REG is not used yet, I think this patch is
necessary. So please take a look at it.
You are right, my Spec
-Original Message-
From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:10 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: j...@8bytes.org; b...@kernel.crashing.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org;
linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org;
-Original Message-
From: linux-pci-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of Alex Williamson
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:33 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: j...@8bytes.org; b...@kernel.crashing.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org;
linux-
25 matches
Mail list logo
