Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU v3 support

On 2016/6/21 22:27, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: Hi Hanjun, On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:37:17PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: Hi Lorenzo, On 2016/6/7 21:30, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: This RFC patch series is v2 of a previous posting: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/14/702 v1 -> v2: - Rebased on

Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix allocation of bases array in driver probe

Hi, On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > From: Shunqian Zheng > > In .probe(), devm_kzalloc() is called with size == 0 and works only > by luck, due to internal behavior of the allocator and the fact > that the proper allocation size

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] arm64: mm: change IOMMU notifier action to attach DMA ops

Hi Marek, On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:53:20AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Robin, > > > On 2016-06-17 11:27, Robin Murphy wrote: > >Hi Lorenzo, > > > >I think this patch makes sense even independent of the rest of the > >series, one nit inline notwithstanding. > > > >Marek; I'm curious as

Re: SMMU driver and stall vs terminate mode

Hi, On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:36:17PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote: -Original Message- From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 4:43 AM To: Robin Murphy Cc: Stuart Yoder ;

RE: SMMU driver and stall vs terminate mode

> -Original Message- > From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 4:43 AM > To: Robin Murphy > Cc: Stuart Yoder ; > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; iommu@lists.linux- > foundation.org; Nipun Gupta

RE: SMMU driver and stall vs terminate mode

> -Original Message- > From: Robin Murphy [mailto:robin.mur...@arm.com] > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 11:09 AM > To: Stuart Yoder ; Will Deacon > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; > Nipun Gupta >

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU v3 support

Hi Hanjun, On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:37:17PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On 2016/6/7 21:30, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >This RFC patch series is v2 of a previous posting: > > > >https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/14/702 > > > >v1 -> v2: > > - Rebased on top of dependencies series

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable on ARM64

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:18:49PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 14:54:35 schrieb Joerg Roedel: > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:42:16PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > In simple words, DRM patches depend on IOMMU patches. > > > > > > More precisely:

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable on ARM64

Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 14:54:35 schrieb Joerg Roedel: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:42:16PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > In simple words, DRM patches depend on IOMMU patches. > > > > More precisely: The IOMMU patches alone are supposed to not break > > anything. Same goes for

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable on ARM64

Hi Tomasz, On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:42:16PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > In simple words, DRM patches depend on IOMMU patches. > > More precisely: The IOMMU patches alone are supposed to not break > anything. Same goes for the first DRM patch (7/8). Only second DRM > patch (8/8) depends on

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: r8a7795 support V2

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:57:23PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > Developed on top of next-20160602 and: > [PATCH v3 00/06] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: IPMMU multi-arch update V3 > > drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 318 > +--- > 1 file changed, 269 insertions(+), 49

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable on ARM64

Hi Joerg, On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:34:33PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > This series intends mostly to enable support for ARM64 architecture > > in the rockchip-iommu driver. On the way to do so, some bugs are also > >

Re: [PATCH V6 0/6] iommu/msm: Add DT adaptation and generic bindings support

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 05:06:01PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: > Sricharan R (6): > iommu/msm: Add DT adaptation > documentation: iommu: Add bindings for msm,iommu-v0 ip > iommu/msm: Move the contents from msm_iommu_dev.c to msm_iommu.c > iommu/msm: Add support for generic master bindings >

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU v3 support

Hi Lorenzo, On 2016/6/7 21:30, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: This RFC patch series is v2 of a previous posting: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/14/702 v1 -> v2: - Rebased on top of dependencies series [1][2][3](v4.7-rc1) - Removed IOMMU fwnode generalization - Implemented ARM

Re: [RFC PATCH 15/15] iommu/exynos: update to use iommu big-endian

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 07:31:10PM +0100, Matthew Leach wrote: > From: Ben Dooks > > Add initial support for big endian by always writing the pte > in le32. Note, revisit if hardware capable of doing big endian > fetches. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Honghui Zhang > > Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701. > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 51 >

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang > > > > Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701. > > > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Honghui Zhang > > Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701. > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 51 >

Re: SMMU driver and stall vs terminate mode

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:08:45PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 20/06/16 16:28, Stuart Yoder wrote: > >Right now the SMMU driver is hardcoded to configure 'stall' mode for > >context faults: > > > > /* SCTLR */ > > reg = SCTLR_CFCFG | SCTLR_CFIE | SCTLR_CFRE | SCTLR_M | > >

Re: [PATCH] iommu/mediatek: Do not call of_node_put in mtk_iommu_of_xlate

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:50:44PM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Honghui Zhang > > The device_node will be released in of_iommu_configure, it may be double > released if call of_node_put in mtk_iommu_of_xlate. > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable on ARM64

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:34:33PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > This series intends mostly to enable support for ARM64 architecture > in the rockchip-iommu driver. On the way to do so, some bugs are also > fixed. > > The most important changes here are: > - making the Rockchip IOMMU driver use

Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Remove create_workqueue

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 01:58:30PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote: > alloc_workqueue replaces deprecated create_workqueue(). > > A dedicated workqueue has been used since the workitem (viz > >work), is involved in IO page-fault handling. > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has been set to guarantee forward

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Support non-PCI devices with SMMUv3

On 2016/6/17 17:14, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 17/06/16 02:54, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> Hi, >> I only applied these patch series on lastest 4.7-rc3, is there any patches I >> missed? >> According to my test, it seems can not work. The problem is: > > Thanks, that's helpful (if irritating)

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] arm64: mm: change IOMMU notifier action to attach DMA ops

Hi Robin, On 2016-06-17 11:27, Robin Murphy wrote: Hi Lorenzo, I think this patch makes sense even independent of the rest of the series, one nit inline notwithstanding. Marek; I'm curious as to whether this could make the workaround in 722ec35f7 obsolete as well, or are all the drivers