On Sat 07-10-17 19:48:37, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 17:34:23 +0200
>
> Omit extra messages for a memory allocation failure in these functions.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Yes this makes sense. None of those really e
Variable did_old is unsigned so checking whether it is greater or equal
to zero is not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Christos Gkekas
---
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index ebb
p-level-sg_num_pages-from-amd-iommu/20171008-133505
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma.git
> master
> config: i386-randconfig-n0-201741 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-4.8 (Debian 4.8.4-1) 4.8.4
> reproduce:
> # save the attached
On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 10:42 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Please stop sending this crap. It's a move from one preference to
> another slightly different one. You are free to apply your preference
> if you do a major overhaul of some code (subject to maintainer
> approval),
> but without that
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 7:50 PM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 19:19:45 +0200
>
> Replace the specification of data structures by pointer dereferences
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer a
Please stop sending this crap. It's a move from one preference to
another slightly different one. You are free to apply your preference
if you do a major overhaul of some code (subject to maintainer approval),
but without that they simply are churn.
NAK for both patches.
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel
>
> Make use of the new alignment capability of
> alloc_irq_index() to enforce IRQ index alignment
> for MSI.
>
> Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner
> Fixes: 2b324506341cb ('iommu/amd: Add routines to manage irq remapping
> tables')
> Sig
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel
>
> For multi-MSI IRQ ranges the IRQ index needs to be aligned
> to the power-of-two of the requested IRQ count. Extend the
> alloc_irq_index() function to allow such an allocation.
>
> Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner
> Fixes: 2b3245063
