Alex,
I had to revise the patch. Please see attachment. It is actually two more SSIDs
affected to that.
Best regards,
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Merger, Edgar [AUTOSOL/MAS/AUGS]
Sent: Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2020 09:23
To: 'Deucher, Alexander' ; 'Huang, Ray'
; 'Kuehling, Felix'
Add the API for getting the domain from a vfio group. This could be used
by the physical device drivers which rely on the vfio/mdev framework for
mediated device user level access. The typical use case like below:
unsigned int pasid;
struct vfio_group *vfio_group;
struct
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 06:27:39PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> That said if you have the time to take a peek at the x86 bits - that
> would be awesome!
Sure, tomorrow.
Good night. :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On December 8, 2020 6:01:19 PM EST, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:22:20PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> I will fix it up.
>
>So who's picking this up? If not me then I probably should have a
>detailed look at the x86 bits before it goes in...
I was planning to pick
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:22:20PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> I will fix it up.
So who's picking this up? If not me then I probably should have a
detailed look at the x86 bits before it goes in...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:10:57PM +, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> From: Ashish Kalra
>
> For SEV, all DMA to and from guest has to use shared (un-encrypted) pages.
> SEV uses SWIOTLB to make this happen without requiring changes to device
> drivers. However, depending on workload being run, the
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:42:04PM -0800, Jianxiong Gao wrote:
> NVMe driver and other applications depend on the data offset
> to operate correctly. Currently when unaligned data is mapped via
> SWIOTLB, the data is mapped as slab aligned with the SWIOTLB. When
> booting with --swiotlb=force
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 19:57:58 +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote:
> Although handling a mapping request with no permissions is a
> trivial no-op, defer the early return until after the size/range
> checks so that we are consistent with other mapping requests.
Applied to arm64 (for-next/iommu/misc), thanks!
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:34:49 +0800, John Garry wrote:
> This series contains some minor tidy-ups by deleting an unreferenced
> function and unexporting some functions, highlighted by:
>
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:29:39 +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> The only user of tlb_flush_leaf is a particularly hairy corner of the
> Arm short-descriptor code, which wants a synchronous invalidation to
> minimise the races inherent in trying to split a large page mapping.
> This is already far enough
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 20:01:50 +0800, Kunkun Jiang wrote:
> Knowing from the code, the macro "iopte_type(pte, l)" doesn't use the
> parameter "l" (level). So we'd better to remove it.
Applied to arm64 (for-next/iommu/misc), thanks!
[1/1] iommu/io-pgtalbe-arm: Remove "iopte_type(pte, l)" extra
On 2020-12-07 11:57, Keqian Zhu wrote:
Although handling a mapping request with no permissions is a
trivial no-op, defer the early return until after the size/range
checks so that we are consistent with other mapping requests.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy
Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu
---
Use devm_add_action_or_reset to avoid the situation where the release
function is not called when devm_add_action returns an error.
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao
---
v2:
repositioning devm_add_action_or_reset in the function
arm_smmu_setup_msis, and check the return value.
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
