Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the module name to be consistent with older kernel

2020-02-13 Thread Will Deacon
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 01:59:46PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:50 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:37:20PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > > > Commit cd221bd24ff5 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Allow building as a module") > > > introduced a side effect that changed the

Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the module name to be consistent with older kernel

2020-02-12 Thread Li Yang
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:50 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:37:20PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > > Commit cd221bd24ff5 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Allow building as a module") > > introduced a side effect that changed the module name from arm-smmu to > > arm-smmu-mod. This breaks the

Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the module name to be consistent with older kernel

2020-02-12 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:37:20PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > Commit cd221bd24ff5 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Allow building as a module") > introduced a side effect that changed the module name from arm-smmu to > arm-smmu-mod. This breaks the users of kernel parameters for the driver > (e.g.

[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the module name to be consistent with older kernel

2020-02-11 Thread Li Yang
Commit cd221bd24ff5 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Allow building as a module") introduced a side effect that changed the module name from arm-smmu to arm-smmu-mod. This breaks the users of kernel parameters for the driver (e.g. arm-smmu.disable_bypass). This patch changes the module name back to be