Hi Robin,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 02:18:55PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Since we ony support the TTB1 quirk for AArch64 contexts, and
> consequently only for 64-bit builds, the sign-extension aspect of the
> "are all bits above IAS consistent?" check should implicitly only apply
> to 64-bit
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 05:11:23PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 11:53:01AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 02:18:55PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > Since we ony support the TTB1 quirk for AArch64 contexts, and
> > > consequently only for 64-bit
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 11:53:01AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 02:18:55PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > Since we ony support the TTB1 quirk for AArch64 contexts, and
> > consequently only for 64-bit builds, the sign-extension aspect of the
> > "are all bits above IAS
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 02:18:55PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Since we ony support the TTB1 quirk for AArch64 contexts, and
> consequently only for 64-bit builds, the sign-extension aspect of the
> "are all bits above IAS consistent?" check should implicitly only apply
> to 64-bit IOVAs. Change
Since we ony support the TTB1 quirk for AArch64 contexts, and
consequently only for 64-bit builds, the sign-extension aspect of the
"are all bits above IAS consistent?" check should implicitly only apply
to 64-bit IOVAs. Change the type of the cast to ensure that 32-bit longs
don't inadvertently
