Re: [PATCH 0/2] Refactor dummy DMA ops

On 07/12/2018 17:05, Christoph Hellwig wrote: So I'd really prefer if we had a separate dummy.c file, like in my take on your previous patch here: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/commitdiff/e01adddc1733fa414dc16cd22e8f58be9b64a025 http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/commitdi

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Refactor dummy DMA ops

So I'd really prefer if we had a separate dummy.c file, like in my take on your previous patch here: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/commitdiff/e01adddc1733fa414dc16cd22e8f58be9b64a025 http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/commitdiff/596bde76e5944a3f4beb8c2769067ca88dda127a Oth

[PATCH 0/2] Refactor dummy DMA ops

Hi all, Tangential to Christoph's RFC for mitigating indirect call overhead in common DMA mapping scenarios[1], this is a little reshuffle to prevent the CONFIG_ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED case from getting in the way. This would best go via the dma-mapping tree, so reviews and acks welcome. Robin. [1] ht