Hi Geert,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 04:42:17PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > - return ops->add_device(dev);
> > + if (ops)
>
> Is this sufficient? The old code checked for ops->add_device != NULL,
> too.
Robin brought up that all iommu-ops implementations support the
Hi Jörg,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:51 PM Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On 2018-12-11 16:05, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > From: Joerg Roedel
> > >
> > > Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
> > > function of the
Hi Marek,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:53:51PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Yes, it fixes this issue.
Thanks a lot, patch is sent out and in iommu tree.
Regards,
Joerg
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Hi Joerg,
On 2018-12-19 15:34, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> thanks for the report!
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 2018-12-11 16:05, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>> From: Joerg Roedel
>>>
>>> Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
>>>
Hi Marek,
thanks for the report!
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 2018-12-11 16:05, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel
> >
> > Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
> > function of the IOMMU-API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
Hi Joerg,
This patch landed in today's linux-next and causes a regression.
On 2018-12-11 16:05, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel
>
> Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
> function of the IOMMU-API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
> ---
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 6
From: Joerg Roedel
Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
function of the IOMMU-API.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
---
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
index
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 06:49:26PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> if (ops && dev->bus && !dev->iommu_group)
>
> What I can't quite remember just now is whether it's actually valid to get
> here with err == 0 but dev->iommu_fwspec->ops == NULL, so it *might* be OK
> to use "!err" instead of
On 05/12/2018 14:36, Joerg Roedel wrote:
From: Joerg Roedel
Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
function of the IOMMU-API.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
---
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Joerg Roedel
Make sure to invoke this call-back through the proper
function of the IOMMU-API.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
---
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
index
10 matches
Mail list logo
