alex.william...@redhat.com;
> jacob.jun@linux.intel.com; yi.l@intel.com; peter.mayd...@linaro.org;
> t...@semihalf.com; bbhush...@marvell.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/13] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
>
> Hi Shameer,
>
> On 5/13/20 5:57
> jacob.jun@linux.intel.com; yi.l@intel.com; peter.mayd...@linaro.org;
>> t...@semihalf.com; bbhush...@marvell.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/13] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
>>
> [...]
>
>>>>> Yes that's normal this series is
.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/13] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
>
[...]
> >>> Yes that's normal this series is not meant to support vSVM at this stage.
> >>>
> >>> I intend to add the missing pieces during the next weeks.
> >>
&
ntel.com; yi.l@intel.com; peter.mayd...@linaro.org;
>> t...@semihalf.com; bbhush...@marvell.com
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 00/13] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Auger Eric [mailto
ntel.com; yi.l@intel.com; peter.mayd...@linaro.org;
>> t...@semihalf.com; bbhush...@marvell.com
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 00/13] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Auger Eric [mailto
gt; > jacob.jun@linux.intel.com; yi.l....@intel.com; peter.mayd...@linaro.org;
> > t...@semihalf.com; bbhush...@marvell.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/13] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
> >
> > Hi Zhangfei,
> >
> > On 4/16/20 6:25 AM, Zhangfei
.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/13] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
>
> Hi Zhangfei,
>
> On 4/16/20 6:25 AM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2020/4/14 下午11:05, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> This version fixes an issue observed by Shameer on an SMMU 3.
Hi Zhangfei,
On 4/16/20 6:25 AM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/4/14 下午11:05, Eric Auger wrote:
>> This version fixes an issue observed by Shameer on an SMMU 3.2,
>> when moving from dual stage config to stage 1 only config.
>> The 2 high 64b of the STE now get reset. Otherwise, leaving the
>
On 2020/4/14 下午11:05, Eric Auger wrote:
This version fixes an issue observed by Shameer on an SMMU 3.2,
when moving from dual stage config to stage 1 only config.
The 2 high 64b of the STE now get reset. Otherwise, leaving the
S2TTB set may cause a C_BAD_STE error.
This series can be found at:
This version fixes an issue observed by Shameer on an SMMU 3.2,
when moving from dual stage config to stage 1 only config.
The 2 high 64b of the STE now get reset. Otherwise, leaving the
S2TTB set may cause a C_BAD_STE error.
This series can be found at:
https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/v5.6-2
10 matches
Mail list logo