Hi Thomas,
On 26/07/2016 11:04, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Eric,
>
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Auger Eric wrote:
>> On 20/07/2016 11:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
@@ -63,10 +63,18 @@ static int msi_compose(struct irq_data *irq_data,
{
int ret =
Eric,
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Auger Eric wrote:
> On 20/07/2016 11:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> @@ -63,10 +63,18 @@ static int msi_compose(struct irq_data *irq_data,
> >> {
> >>int ret = 0;
> >>
> >> - if (erase)
> >> + if (erase) {
> >>
Hi Thomas,
On 20/07/2016 11:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
>
> First of all - valid for all patches:
>
> Subject: sys/subsys: Sentence starts with an uppercase letter
OK understood.
>
> Now for this particular one:
>
> genirq/msi: use the MSI doorbell's
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
First of all - valid for all patches:
Subject: sys/subsys: Sentence starts with an uppercase letter
Now for this particular one:
genirq/msi: use the MSI doorbell's IOVA when requested
> On MSI message composition we now use the MSI doorbell's IOVA in
>
On MSI message composition we now use the MSI doorbell's IOVA in
place of the doorbell's PA in case the device is upstream to an
IOMMU that requires MSI addresses to be mapped. The doorbell's
allocation and mapping happened on an early stage (pci_enable_msi).
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
