Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-17 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:26:18AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > >>/* > >> - * If SME is active we need to be sure that kexec pages are > >> - * not encrypted because when we boot to the new kernel the > >> + * If host memory encryption is active we need to be sure that kexec > >> + *

Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-17 Thread Tom Lendacky via iommu
On 8/17/21 5:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:25AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c >> b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c >> index 8e7b517ad738..66ff788b79c9 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c >> +++

Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-17 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:25AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c > b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c > index 8e7b517ad738..66ff788b79c9 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c > @@ -167,7 +167,7

[PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-13 Thread Tom Lendacky via iommu
Replace occurrences of sev_active() with the more generic prot_guest_has() using PATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT, except for in arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt*.c where PATTR_SEV will be used. If future support is added for other memory encryption technologies, the use of PATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT can be updated,