On 05/24/2012 06:46 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 17:38 -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
On 05/22/2012 01:05 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
x86 is probably the wrong name for this VFIO IOMMU driver, but x86
is the primary target for it. This driver support a very simple
usage model usin
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 17:38 -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 01:05 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > x86 is probably the wrong name for this VFIO IOMMU driver, but x86
> > is the primary target for it. This driver support a very simple
> > usage model using the existing IOMMU API. The IOMMU
On 05/22/2012 01:05 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
x86 is probably the wrong name for this VFIO IOMMU driver, but x86
is the primary target for it. This driver support a very simple
usage model using the existing IOMMU API. The IOMMU is expected to
support the full host address space with no specia
x86 is probably the wrong name for this VFIO IOMMU driver, but x86
is the primary target for it. This driver support a very simple
usage model using the existing IOMMU API. The IOMMU is expected to
support the full host address space with no special IOVA windows,
number of mappings restrictions,
