Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-06-03 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 31.05.19 um 19:32 schrieb Laurentiu Tudor: >> -Original Message- >> From: Andreas Färber >> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:04 PM >> >> Hello Laurentiu, >> >> Am 31.05.19 um 18:46 schrieb Laurentiu Tudor: -Original Message- From: Andreas Färber Sent: Friday, May

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:45:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Bleh, I'm certainly not keen on formalising any kind of > dma_to_phys()/dma_to_virt() interface for this. Or are you just proposing > something like dma_unmap_sorry_sir_the_dog_ate_my_homework() for drivers > which have 'lost' the

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Robin Murphy
On 31/05/2019 18:08, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:03:30PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: The thing needs to be completely redone as it abuses parts of the iommu API in a completely unacceptable way. `git grep iommu_iova_to_phys drivers/{crypto,gpu,net}` :( I guess one

RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Laurentiu Tudor
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Färber > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:04 PM > > Hello Laurentiu, > > Am 31.05.19 um 18:46 schrieb Laurentiu Tudor: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Andreas Färber > >> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 7:15 PM > >> > >> Hi Laurentiu, > >> > >> Am

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:03:30PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > The thing needs to be completely redone as it abuses parts of the > > iommu API in a completely unacceptable way. > > `git grep iommu_iova_to_phys drivers/{crypto,gpu,net}` > > :( > > I guess one alternative is for the offending

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Robin Murphy
On 31/05/2019 17:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 03:08:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:19:45 +0300 Depends on this pull request: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-May/653554.html I'm not

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Hello Laurentiu, Am 31.05.19 um 18:46 schrieb Laurentiu Tudor: >> -Original Message- >> From: Andreas Färber >> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 7:15 PM >> >> Hi Laurentiu, >> >> Am 30.05.19 um 16:19 schrieb laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com: >>> This patch series contains several fixes in preparation

RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Laurentiu Tudor
Hello Andreas, > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Färber > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 7:15 PM > > Hi Laurentiu, > > Am 30.05.19 um 16:19 schrieb laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com: > > This patch series contains several fixes in preparation for SMMU > > support on NXP LS1043A and LS1046A chips.

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 03:08:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com > Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:19:45 +0300 > > > Depends on this pull request: > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-May/653554.html > > I'm not sure how you want me to

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi Laurentiu, Am 30.05.19 um 16:19 schrieb laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com: > This patch series contains several fixes in preparation for SMMU > support on NXP LS1043A and LS1046A chips. Once these get picked up, > I'll submit the actual SMMU enablement patches consisting in the > required device tree

RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-31 Thread Laurentiu Tudor
Hello, > -Original Message- > From: David Miller > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 1:09 AM > > From: laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com > Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:19:45 +0300 > > > Depends on this pull request: > > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-May/653554.html > >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-30 Thread Li Yang
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM David Miller wrote: > > From: laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com > Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:19:45 +0300 > > > Depends on this pull request: > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-May/653554.html > > I'm not sure how you want me to handle this.

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-30 Thread David Miller
From: laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:19:45 +0300 > Depends on this pull request: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-May/653554.html I'm not sure how you want me to handle this.

[PATCH v3 0/6] Prerequisites for NXP LS104xA SMMU enablement

2019-05-30 Thread laurentiu . tudor
From: Laurentiu Tudor This patch series contains several fixes in preparation for SMMU support on NXP LS1043A and LS1046A chips. Once these get picked up, I'll submit the actual SMMU enablement patches consisting in the required device tree changes. This patch series contains only part of the