On 2021-08-12 02:45, David Stevens wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 4:12 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-08-11 03:42, David Stevens wrote:
From: David Stevens
For devices which set min_align_mask, swiotlb preserves the offset of
the original physical address within that mask. Since
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 4:12 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-11 03:42, David Stevens wrote:
> > From: David Stevens
> >
> > For devices which set min_align_mask, swiotlb preserves the offset of
> > the original physical address within that mask. Since __iommu_dma_map
> > accounts for
On 2021-08-11 03:42, David Stevens wrote:
From: David Stevens
For devices which set min_align_mask, swiotlb preserves the offset of
the original physical address within that mask. Since __iommu_dma_map
accounts for non-aligned addresses, passing a non-aligned swiotlb
address with the swiotlb
> -Original Message-
> From: iommu On Behalf Of
> David Stevens
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 10:43 AM
> To: Robin Murphy ; Will Deacon
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Tom Murphy ;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; David Stevens
> Subject: [PATCH v3
From: David Stevens
For devices which set min_align_mask, swiotlb preserves the offset of
the original physical address within that mask. Since __iommu_dma_map
accounts for non-aligned addresses, passing a non-aligned swiotlb
address with the swiotlb aligned size results in the offset being
