On 2020-04-28 4:32 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:02:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:19:48PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
1. introduce a dma_{map,sync,unmap}_sgtable() wrappers, which will use
a proper sg_table entries and call
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:02:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:19:48PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > 1. introduce a dma_{map,sync,unmap}_sgtable() wrappers, which will use
> >a proper sg_table entries and call respective DMA-mapping functions
> >and
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:19:48PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> 1. introduce a dma_{map,sync,unmap}_sgtable() wrappers, which will use
>a proper sg_table entries and call respective DMA-mapping functions
>and adapt current code to it
That sounds reasonable to me. Those could be
Dear All,
During the Exynos DRM GEM rework and fixing the issues in the
drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() function [1] I've noticed that most
drivers in DRM framework incorrectly use nents and orig_nents entries of
the struct sg_table.
In case of the most DMA-mapping implementations exchanging
