On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:34:39PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Or if we want to guard against ACPI adding a type 0 in the future, I
> could make the function return an int and then return -EINVAL if an e820
> entry isn't found. This might be the better option.
Yap, think so too. I don't trust
On 2/20/2017 2:09 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:44:30AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
This patch adds support to return the E820 type associated with an address
s/This patch adds/Add/
range.
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky
---
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:44:30AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This patch adds support to return the E820 type associated with an address
s/This patch adds/Add/
> range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h |2 ++
>
This patch adds support to return the E820 type associated with an address
range.
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky
---
arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h |2 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h |2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c| 26