On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 09:04 -0700, Andrew Waterman wrote:
> This needs to be discussed and debated at length; proposing edits to
> the spec at this stage is putting the cart before the horse!
>
> We shouldn’t change the definition of the existing SFENCE.VMA
> instruction to accomplish this. It’s
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:10 AM Andrew Waterman wrote:
>
> This needs to be discussed and debated at length; proposing edits to the spec
> at this stage is putting the cart before the horse!
Agree :)
>
> We shouldn’t change the definition of the existing SFENCE.VMA instruction to
>
This needs to be discussed and debated at length; proposing edits to the
spec at this stage is putting the cart before the horse!
We shouldn’t change the definition of the existing SFENCE.VMA instruction
to accomplish this. It’s also not abundantly clear to me that this should
be an instruction:
