On 2021-08-05 16:16, John Garry wrote:
On 05/08/2021 15:41, Robin Murphy wrote:
I suppose they could be combined into a smaller sub-struct and loaded
in a single operation, but it looks messy, and prob without much gain.
Indeed I wouldn't say that saving memory is the primary concern here,
On 05/08/2021 15:41, Robin Murphy wrote:
I suppose they could be combined into a smaller sub-struct and loaded
in a single operation, but it looks messy, and prob without much gain.
Indeed I wouldn't say that saving memory is the primary concern here,
and any more convoluted code is hardly
On 2021-08-05 14:40, John Garry wrote:
On 05/08/2021 12:24, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-21 17:36, John Garry wrote:
Members of struct "llq" will be zero-inited, apart from member
max_n_shift.
But we write llq.val straight after the init, so it was pointless to
zero
init those other
On 05/08/2021 12:24, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-21 17:36, John Garry wrote:
Members of struct "llq" will be zero-inited, apart from member
max_n_shift.
But we write llq.val straight after the init, so it was pointless to zero
init those other members. As such, separately init member
On 2021-08-05 12:24, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-21 17:36, John Garry wrote:
Members of struct "llq" will be zero-inited, apart from member
max_n_shift.
But we write llq.val straight after the init, so it was pointless to zero
init those other members. As such, separately init member
On 2021-06-21 17:36, John Garry wrote:
Members of struct "llq" will be zero-inited, apart from member max_n_shift.
But we write llq.val straight after the init, so it was pointless to zero
init those other members. As such, separately init member max_n_shift
only.
In addition, struct "head" is
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 11:22:15AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 21/06/2021 17:36, John Garry wrote:
> > Members of struct "llq" will be zero-inited, apart from member max_n_shift.
> > But we write llq.val straight after the init, so it was pointless to zero
> > init those other members. As such,
On 21/06/2021 17:36, John Garry wrote:
Members of struct "llq" will be zero-inited, apart from member max_n_shift.
But we write llq.val straight after the init, so it was pointless to zero
init those other members. As such, separately init member max_n_shift
only.
In addition, struct "head" is
