Hi Greg,
On 2021/12/13 8:50, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 12/10/21 9:23 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Greg, Jason and Christoph,
On 12/9/21 9:20 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 12/7/21 9:16 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:57:25AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 12/6/21 11:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
This approach looks much better to me.
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 08:50:05AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > Does this work for you? Can I work towards this in the next version?
>
> A kindly ping ... Is this heading the right direction? I need your
> advice to move ahead. :-)
I prefer this to all the duplicated code in the v3 series.. Given
On 12/10/21 9:23 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Greg, Jason and Christoph,
On 12/9/21 9:20 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 12/7/21 9:16 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:57:25AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 12/6/21 11:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 06:36:27AM -0800,
Hi Greg, Jason and Christoph,
On 12/9/21 9:20 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 12/7/21 9:16 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:57:25AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 12/6/21 11:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 06:36:27AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I really hate
On 12/7/21 9:16 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:57:25AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 12/6/21 11:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 06:36:27AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I really hate the amount of boilerplate code that having this in each
bus type
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:25:04AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 09:16:27AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Yes, the suggestion was to put everything that 'if' inside a function
> > and then of course a matching undo function.
>
> Can't we simplify things even more?
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 09:16:27AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Yes, the suggestion was to put everything that 'if' inside a function
> and then of course a matching undo function.
Can't we simplify things even more? Do away with the DMA API owner
entirely, and instead in
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:57:25AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 12/6/21 11:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 06:36:27AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > I really hate the amount of boilerplate code that having this in each
> > > bus type causes.
> > +1
> >
> > I liked
On 12/6/21 11:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 06:36:27AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I really hate the amount of boilerplate code that having this in each
bus type causes.
+1
I liked the first version of this series better with the code near
really_probe().
Can we
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 06:36:27AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I really hate the amount of boilerplate code that having this in each
> bus type causes.
+1
I liked the first version of this series better with the code near
really_probe().
Can we go back to that with some
I really hate the amount of boilerplate code that having this in each
bus type causes.
Between that and the suggestion from Joerg I wonder if we could do the
following again:
- add new no_kernel_dma flag to struct device_driver
- set this flag for the various vfio drivers
- skip claiming the
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 09:58:49AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Multiple platform devices may be placed in the same IOMMU group because
> they cannot be isolated from each other. These devices must either be
> entirely under kernel control or userspace control, never a mixture. This
> checks and sets
13 matches
Mail list logo
