Re: [RFC v4 15/16] vfio/type1: Check MSI remapping at irq domain level

2016-12-23 Thread Auger Eric
Hi Geetha, On 23/12/2016 14:33, Geetha Akula wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Seeing same issue reported by Diana on ThunderX with you > v4.9-reserved-v4 branch. > Vfio passthough work fine when allow_unsafe_interrupts is set. Thank you for testing! I will fix the security assessment by better studying

Re: [RFC v4 15/16] vfio/type1: Check MSI remapping at irq domain level

2016-12-23 Thread Geetha Akula
Hi Eric, Seeing same issue reported by Diana on ThunderX with you v4.9-reserved-v4 branch. Vfio passthough work fine when allow_unsafe_interrupts is set. Thank you, Geetha. On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Diana, > > On 22/12/2016 13:41, Diana

Re: [RFC v4 15/16] vfio/type1: Check MSI remapping at irq domain level

2016-12-22 Thread Auger Eric
Hi Diana, On 22/12/2016 13:41, Diana Madalina Craciun wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 12/13/2016 10:32 PM, Eric Auger wrote: >> In case the IOMMU does not bypass MSI transactions (typical >> case on ARM), we check all MSI controllers are IRQ remapping >> capable. If not the IRQ assignment may be

Re: [RFC v4 15/16] vfio/type1: Check MSI remapping at irq domain level

2016-12-22 Thread Diana Madalina Craciun
Hi Eric, On 12/13/2016 10:32 PM, Eric Auger wrote: > In case the IOMMU does not bypass MSI transactions (typical > case on ARM), we check all MSI controllers are IRQ remapping > capable. If not the IRQ assignment may be unsafe. > > At this stage the arm-smmu-(v3) still advertise the >