On Sat, Sep 26 2020 at 14:38, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:54:52AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> Yes, as well as on mips and sparc which also don't FORCE_PCI.
> This seems to work for s390:
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index b0b7acf07eb8..41136fbe909b
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:54:52AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 13:17 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner
> >
> > The arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks are compiled in whether an architecture
> > requires them or not. Architectures which are fully utilizing
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 13:17 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> The arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks are compiled in whether an architecture
> requires them or not. Architectures which are fully utilizing hierarchical
> irq domains should never call into that code.
>
> It's
On Thu, Aug 27 2020 at 13:20, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Make the architectures and drivers which rely on them select them in Kconfig
>> and if not selected replace them by stub functions which emit a warning and
>> fail the PCI/MSI
On 2020-08-28 13:54, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 01:47:59PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> So the arch_setup_msi_irq/etc is not really an arch hook, but some
> infrastructure to support those 4 PCI root port drivers.
I happen to have a *really old* patch addressing Tegra [1],
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 01:47:59PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > So the arch_setup_msi_irq/etc is not really an arch hook, but some
> > infrastructure to support those 4 PCI root port drivers.
>
> I happen to have a *really old* patch addressing Tegra [1], which
> I was never able to test (no
Hi Jason,
On 2020-08-28 13:19, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:21:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
> And I can't figure out what's special about tegra, rcar, and xilinx
> that makes them need it as
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:21:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > And I can't figure out what's special about tegra, rcar, and xilinx
> > that makes them need it as well. Is there something I could grep for
> > to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
> And I can't figure out what's special about tegra, rcar, and xilinx
> that makes them need it as well. Is there something I could grep for
> to identify them? Is there a way to convert them so they don't need
> it?
I think
[+cc Rob,
cover https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200826111628.794979...@linutronix.de/
this https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200826112333.992429...@linutronix.de/]
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> The arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks are compiled
On Wed, Aug 26 2020 at 22:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:17:02 +0100,
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> @@ -103,6 +105,7 @@ config PCIE_XILINX_CPM
>> bool "Xilinx Versal CPM host bridge support"
>> depends on ARCH_ZYNQMP || COMPILE_TEST
>> select PCI_HOST_COMMON
>> +
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:17:02 +0100,
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> The arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks are compiled in whether an architecture
> requires them or not. Architectures which are fully utilizing hierarchical
> irq domains should never call into that code.
>
>
On Wed, Aug 26 2020 at 13:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> + * If CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS is not selected they are replaced by
> + * stubs with warnings.
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_DISABLE_ARCH_FALLBACKS
Groan, I obviously failed to pull that back from the test box where I
fixed it. That
13 matches
Mail list logo
