On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:51:20AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:33AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > That's a much better plan. It is also not super urgent, so maybe for now
> > > we could add an explicit
On Tue, 11 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:33AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > That's a much better plan. It is also not super urgent, so maybe for now
> > we could add an explicit check for io_tlb_default_mem != NULL at the
> > beginning of
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:33AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> That's a much better plan. It is also not super urgent, so maybe for now
> we could add an explicit check for io_tlb_default_mem != NULL at the
> beginning of xen_swiotlb_init? So that at least we can fail explicitly
> or ignore
On Tue, 11 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:46:34PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > The pointer dereferenced seems to suggest that the
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:46:34PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > The pointer dereferenced seems to suggest that the swiotlb hasn't been
> > > allocated. From what I can tell,
On Mon, 10 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > The pointer dereferenced seems to suggest that the swiotlb hasn't been
> > allocated. From what I can tell, this may be because swiotlb_force is set
> > to SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE, we will
On 5/10/2021 11:15 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 10/05/2021 09:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> The pointer dereferenced seems to suggest that the swiotlb hasn't been
>>> allocated. From what I can tell, this may
Hi Christoph,
On 10/05/2021 09:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
The pointer dereferenced seems to suggest that the swiotlb hasn't been
allocated. From what I can tell, this may be because swiotlb_force is set
to SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE, we
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> The pointer dereferenced seems to suggest that the swiotlb hasn't been
> allocated. From what I can tell, this may be because swiotlb_force is set
> to SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE, we will still enable the swiotlb when running on top
> of
