Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:58:14PM -0400:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:48:24PM +0900, 'Dominique MARTINET' wrote:
> > Thanks, that should be good.
> >
> > Do you want me to send a follow-up patch with the two extra checks
> > (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE -1)) >
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:48:24PM +0900, 'Dominique MARTINET' wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:16:43AM -0400:
> > The beaty of 'devel' and 'linux-next' is that they can be reshuffled and
> > mangled. I pushed them original patch from Bumyong there and will let
> >
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:16:43AM -0400:
> The beaty of 'devel' and 'linux-next' is that they can be reshuffled and
> mangled. I pushed them original patch from Bumyong there and will let
> it sit for a day and then create a stable branch and give it to Linus.
Thanks,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 01:14:48PM +0900, 'Dominique MARTINET' wrote:
> Chanho Park wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:55:22AM +0900:
> > Sure. No problem. But, the patch was already stacked on Konrad's tree
> > and linux-next as well.
> >
> >
Chanho Park wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:55:22AM +0900:
> Sure. No problem. But, the patch was already stacked on Konrad's tree
> and linux-next as well.
>
>
+ Bumyong who is the original author of the patch.
Hi Dominique,
> Thanks!
> (a bit late, but added Chanho Park in Cc...)
>
> I can confirm it also works for our caam problem, as Horia said.
>
> I've also come to term with the use of swiotlb_align_offset() through
> testing, or rather many
Jianxiong Gao wrote on Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:01:59AM -0700:
> > Jianxiong Gao, before spending more time on this, could you also try
> > Chanho Park's patch?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210510091816.ga2...@lst.de/T/#m0d0df6490350a08dcc24c9086c8edc165b402d6f
> >
> I have tested
> Jianxiong Gao, before spending more time on this, could you also try
> Chanho Park's patch?
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210510091816.ga2...@lst.de/T/#m0d0df6490350a08dcc24c9086c8edc165b402d6f
>
I have tested Chanho Parks's patch and it works for us.
The NVMe driver performs correctly
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:27:39PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> How unique is this NVMe? Should I be able to reproduce this with any
> type or is it specific to Google Cloud?
With swiotlb=force this should be reproducable everywhere.
___
iommu
Christoph Hellwig wrote on Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 07:12:32AM +0200:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:39:15AM +0900, Dominique MARTINET wrote:
> > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:27:39PM -0400:
> > > Thank you for testing that - and this is a bummer indeed.
> >
> > Hm, actually
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:39:15AM +0900, Dominique MARTINET wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:27:39PM -0400:
> > Thank you for testing that - and this is a bummer indeed.
>
> Hm, actually not that surprising if it was working without the offset
> adjustments and
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:27:39PM -0400:
> Thank you for testing that - and this is a bummer indeed.
Hm, actually not that surprising if it was working without the offset
adjustments and doing non-aligned mappings -- perhaps the nvme code just
needs to round the
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:49:54PM -0700, Jianxiong Gao wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 3:35 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 08:21:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
> > > > I've noticed the
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 3:35 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 08:21:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
> > > I've noticed the failure also in v5.10 and v5.11 stable kernels,
> > > since the patch set
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 3:35 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
>
> Linus,
>
> Would you be terribly offended if I took your code (s/unsigned
> long/unsigned int), and used Chanho's description of the problem (see below)?
No offense to that at all - that looks like the right solution. See my
answer
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> FYI, there has been a patch on the list that should have fixed this
> for about a month:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210510091816.ga2...@lst.de/T/#m0d0df6490350a08dcc24c9086c8edc165b402d6f
Honestly, that patch is all
On 6/11/2021 1:35 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 08:21:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
>>> I've noticed the failure also in v5.10 and v5.11 stable kernels,
>>> since the patch set has been backported.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 08:21:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
> > I've noticed the failure also in v5.10 and v5.11 stable kernels,
> > since the patch set has been backported.
>
> FYI, there has been a patch on the list that
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
> I've noticed the failure also in v5.10 and v5.11 stable kernels,
> since the patch set has been backported.
FYI, there has been a patch on the list that should have fixed this
for about a month:
On 6/10/2021 10:41 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> How about a patch like the attached? Does that fix things for you.
>
Yes, it fixes the caam driver regression.
Tested-by: Horia Geantă
on top of next-20210610.
Thank you,
Horia
___
iommu mailing list
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 7:52 AM Horia Geantă wrote:
>
> Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst explicitly allows for partial syncs:
> Synchronise a single contiguous or scatter/gather mapping for the CPU
> and device. With the sync_sg API, all the parameters must be the same
> as those passed into
On 6/8/2021 5:35 AM, Dominique MARTINET wrote:
> I'm not able to find any individual mails for Christoph's patches so
> replying to the PR.
>
The patch set is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210207160327.2955490-1-...@lst.de
> In particular, this commit:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote
22 matches
Mail list logo
