Hi Alex
Going through the PCIe Spec, there seems a lot of such capabilities
that are different between PF and VF. Some that make sense
and some don't.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 08:10:43PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
>
> >
> > I agree though, I don't know why the SIG would preclude implementing
> >
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:19:40AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 21:00:21 -0700
> "Raj, Ashok" wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex
> >
> > + Bjorn
>
> + Don
>
> > FWIW I can't understand why PCI SIG went different ways with ATS,
> > where its enumerated on PF and VF. But for PASID and
Hi Daniel,
On 2020/4/13 10:25, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 9:22 AM Lu Baolu wrote:
This is caused by the fragile private domain implementation. We are in
process of removing it by enhancing the iommu subsystem with per-group
default domain.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 9:22 AM Lu Baolu wrote:
> This is caused by the fragile private domain implementation. We are in
> process of removing it by enhancing the iommu subsystem with per-group
> default domain.
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/iommu/msg42976.html
>
> So ultimately VMD
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:50:09AM +0800, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > different addressing capabilities and some require translation. Instead we
> > can
> > put the real DMA dev and any subdevices on the DMA domain. This change
> > assigns
> > subdevices to the DMA domain, and moves the real DMA
