Add SM8450 qcom iommu implementation to the table of
qcom_smmu_impl_of_match table which brings in iommu support for
SM8450 SoC
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
Add the SoC specific compatible for SM8450 implementing
arm,mmu-500.
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
This adds the binding and support for IOMMU found in SM8450 SoC
Vinod Koul (2):
dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible for SM8450 SoC
iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Add SM8450 qcom iommu implementation
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 +
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:20 AM Ross Philipson
wrote:
>
> The larger focus of the Trechboot project (https://github.com/TrenchBoot) is
> to
> enhance the boot security and integrity in a unified manner. The first area of
> focus has been on the Trusted Computing Group's Dynamic Launch for
>
Hej,
On 2021-11-17 22:15:05 +0100, Sven Peter wrote:
>
> This is a fairly brief series to add support for the DARTs present in the
> M1 Pro/Max. They have two differences that make them incompatible with
> those in the M1:
>
> - the physical addresses are shifted left by 4 bits and and have 2
On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 09:36, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:54:18PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2021-11-29 14:42, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > It's actually 0 when the vector cannot be found.
>>
>> Oh, -1 for my reading comprehension but +1 for my confidence in the patch
>>
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:20:19 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Add new allocation functions which can be activated by domain info
> flags. They store the groups pointer in struct msi_device_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
A few trivial comments...
> ---
> include/linux/msi.h |
On 30.11.21 09:39, Yong Wu wrote:
On Sat, 2021-11-27 at 12:11 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
On 10.11.21 09:50, Yong Wu wrote:
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 07:29 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
On 10.11.21 04:20, Yong Wu wrote:
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 14:21 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
Hi
This
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:11:36AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>> I find that two pageblocks with different migratetypes, like
> >>> MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE
> >>> and MIGRATE_MOVABLE can be merged into a single free page after I checked
> >>> __free_one_page() in detail and printed pageblock
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:54:18PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-11-29 14:42, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 13:13, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 2021-11-29 10:55, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > > - }
> > > > > + smmu->evtq.q.irq = msi_get_virq(dev, EVTQ_MSI_INDEX);
>
On 11/29/21 23:08, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2021, at 12:32, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
>> On 11/23/21 17:35, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> On 19 Nov 2021, at 10:15, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From what my understanding, cma required alignment of
>> max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order), because when MIGRATE_CMA
Currently, when iommu.passthrough=1 is set,
all arm smmu peripherals are bypassed. This
patch allows specific peripherals to use smmu translate.
Signed-off-by: Jay Chen
---
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 +++
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 41
12 matches
Mail list logo
