Hi Alex,
On 2013/01/18 6:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 12:20 +0900, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote:
I mistakenly sent this with the tag [PATCH] when it should have been
[RFC]. Updated with this reply.
Hi Alex,
On 2013/01/17 6:47, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 19:
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 12:20 +0900, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote:
> I mistakenly sent this with the tag [PATCH] when it should have been
> [RFC]. Updated with this reply.
>
> Hi Alex,
> On 2013/01/17 6:47, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 19:10 +0900, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote:
> >
Hi Hiroshi,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:43:21PM +, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Will Deacon wrote @ Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:51:14 +0100:
> > Given that this information is not discoverable, it needs to be encoded
> > in the device tree, but where? I can see two approaches:
> >
> > 1. For each IOMMU no
> -Original Message-
> From: iommu-boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu-
> boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Damian Hobson-Garcia
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:51 AM
> To: Alex Williamson
> Cc: h...@igel.co.jp; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org;
> dw...@in
