On 2013/11/20 23:59, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 08:46 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> I don't know the IOMMU drivers well either, but it seems like they
>> rely on notifications of device addition and removal (see
>> iommu_bus_notifier()). It doesn't seem right for them to al
Hi Bill,
I have tested this prototype patch on hp z420, it works very well.
Looking forward to your formal patch set. I can help test and review.
Baoquan
Thanks
On 11/18/13 at 11:30pm, Sumner, William wrote:
> Thank you for testing this RFC patch. It is great to have confirmation that
> the co
On 11/20/2013 01:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Rob Herring wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:45:02 +0100:
>>
>>> On 11/19/2013 11:35 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:40:54AM +, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Grant
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:45:02PM +, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 11/19/2013 11:35 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > Adding Andreas and Rob for input on potential binding additions to the
>> > SMMU.
>>
>> The above proposal would be an incompatible
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Rob Herring wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:45:02 +0100:
>
>> On 11/19/2013 11:35 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:40:54AM +, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
>> >> Grant Likely wrote @ Fri, 15 Nov 2013
>> >> 08:06:27
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:31:11AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:45:02PM +, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On 11/19/2013 11:35 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > > Adding Andreas and Rob for input on potential binding additio
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 10:47 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> From: Bharat Bhushan
>
> PAMU (FSL IOMMU) has a concept of primary window and subwindows.
> Primary window corresponds to the complete guest iova address space
> (including MSI space), with respect to IOMMU_API this is termed as
> geometr
On 11/20/2013 07:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Thierry Reding wrote @ Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:14:48
> +0100:
(Yes, what Thierry said)
>
>>> Does the above mean the following?
>>>
>>> int of_iommu_attach(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>> struct of_phandle_args args;
>>>
>>> of
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 08:46 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> I don't know the IOMMU drivers well either, but it seems like they
> rely on notifications of device addition and removal (see
> iommu_bus_notifier()). It doesn't seem right for them to also use the
> generic PCI interfaces like pci_get_
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 16:09 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 16:37 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 11:14 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > iommu_map splits requests into pages that the iommu driver reports
> > > that it can handle. The iommu_unmap pat
Thierry Reding wrote @ Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:14:48
+0100:
> > Does the above mean the following?
> >
> > int of_iommu_attach(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > int i;
> > struct of_phandle_args args;
> >
> > of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "iommus",
> >
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:31:11AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:45:02PM +, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 11/19/2013 11:35 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Adding Andreas and Rob for input on potential binding additions to the
> > > SMMU.
> >
> > The above proposal would be a
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:17:08AM +0100, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Stephen Warren wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:22:47
> +0100:
>
> > On 11/19/2013 05:03 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > > Hi Thierry,
> > >
> > > Thierry Reding wrote @ Tue, 19 Nov 2013
> > > 11:25:07 +0100:
> > >
> > >> From earlier di
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:45:02PM +, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 11:35 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Adding Andreas and Rob for input on potential binding additions to the SMMU.
>
> The above proposal would be an incompatible change. However, I think we
> could still deal with a change in
14 matches
Mail list logo