On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 17:36 -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:10:23 -0600
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 12:58 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:09:21PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 10:21 -06
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:10:23 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 12:58 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:09:21PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 10:21 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 23:06 +080
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:23:36 +
Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 2:47 PM
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:47:51PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > > I also, was at the point where I thought we should perhaps just
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 2:47 PM
> To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> Cc: Alex Williamson; Alexander Graf; k...@vger.kernel.org;
> jan.kis...@siemens.com; will.dea...@arm.com;
> a.r...@virtualopensystems.com; Michal Hoc
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:47:51PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> I also, was at the point where I thought we should perhaps just
> go with current mechanisms and implement new_id for the platform
> bus...but Greg's recent response is 'platform devices suck' and it sounds
> like he would reject a new
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 5:09 PM
> To: Alexander Graf
> Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org; jan.kis...@siemens.com; will.dea...@arm.com;
> Yoder Stuart-B08248; a.r...@virtualopensystems.com; Michal Hocko; Wood
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:21 AM
> To: Alexander Graf
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; k...@vger.kernel.org; jan.kis...@siemens.com;
> will.dea...@arm.com; Yoder Stuart-B08248; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 2:00 AM
> To: Antonios Motakis
> Cc: Yoder Stuart-B08248; alex.william...@redhat.com;
> kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org;
On 31/03/14 15:01, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Geert,
On Monday 31 March 2014 10:52:28 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
+ ipmmu_sy0: mmu@e6280800 {
+ compatible = "renesas,ipmmu-vmsa";
+ reg = <0 0xe6280800 0 0
Hi Geert,
On Monday 31 March 2014 10:45:00 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > @@ -828,16 +829,31 @@ static phys_addr_t ipmmu_iova_to_phys(struct
> > iommu_domain *io_domain,>
> > static int ipmmu_find_utlb(struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu, stru
Hi Geert,
On Monday 31 March 2014 10:52:28 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > + ipmmu_sy0: mmu@e6280800 {
> > + compatible = "renesas,ipmmu-vmsa";
> > + reg = <0 0xe6280800 0 0x800>;
>
> Shouldn't this be "re
Hi Geert,
On Monday 31 March 2014 10:39:48 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > +Required Properties:
> > +
> > + - compatible: Must contain "renesas,ipmmu-vmsa".
> > + - reg: Base address and size of the IPMMU registers.
> > + - interrupts:
Hi Laurent,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> + ipmmu_sy0: mmu@e6280800 {
> + compatible = "renesas,ipmmu-vmsa";
> + reg = <0 0xe6280800 0 0x800>;
Shouldn't this be "reg = <0 0xe628 0 0x1000>", i.e. expose both
banks?
Is there any
Hi Laurent,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> @@ -828,16 +829,31 @@ static phys_addr_t ipmmu_iova_to_phys(struct
> iommu_domain *io_domain,
>
> static int ipmmu_find_utlb(struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu, struct device *dev)
> {
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fix
Hi Laurent,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> +Required Properties:
> +
> + - compatible: Must contain "renesas,ipmmu-vmsa".
> + - reg: Base address and size of the IPMMU registers.
> + - interrupts: Specifier for the MMU fault interrupt.
Does it make sense to have a
15 matches
Mail list logo