To get KFD support in radeon we need the following
initialization to happen in this order, their
respective driver file that has its init routine
listed next to it:
0. AMD IOMMUv1:arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
1. AMD IOMMUv2:drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c
2. AMD KFD:drivers/gpu/drm/amd/a
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:23:51PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 02:03:50PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > You said that with my patch you saw AMD IOMMUv2 kick off first,
> > that was intentional as I thought that's what you needed. Can
> > someone please describe the re
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:02:52AM +0800, Wan Zongshun wrote:
>
> You have to take carefully to arrange the calling sequence for
> iommuv1, iommuv2, kfd module, and drm like the following sequence :
> v1 ->v2->kfd, drm.
>
> iommuv1 -- rootfs_initcall(fn)
> IOMMUV2 -- device_initcall(fn)
> kfd mod
Linus, please pull from
git://git.infradead.org/intel-iommu.git
This patchset improves the scalability of the Intel IOMMU code by
resolving two spinlock bottlenecks and eliminating the linearity of
the IOVA allocator, yielding up to ~5x performance improvement and
approaching iommu=off per
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>On 25/05/16 22:43, Wei Yang wrote:
>>On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>On 25/05/16 00:06, Wei Yang wrote:
Hi, Joerg
Not sure whether you think this calculation is correct.
If I missed
On 05/25/2016 02:30 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May, at 09:54:31AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>
>> I looked into this and this would be a large change also to parse tables
>> and build lists. It occurred to me that this could all be taken care of
>> if the early_memremap calls were changed to
Hey Mitch,
On 26/05/16 01:26, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
Hey there,
We're experiencing an issue with IOMMU groups and PCI-e devices. The
system in question has a WLAN DMA master behind a PCI-e root complex
which is, in turn, behind an IOMMU. There are no there devices behind
the RC. This is on
On 25/05/16 22:43, Wei Yang wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 25/05/16 00:06, Wei Yang wrote:
Hi, Joerg
Not sure whether you think this calculation is correct.
If I missed something for this " + 1" in your formula, I am glad to hear your
explanation. So t
On 26 May 2016 at 06:05, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> Hi Uffe,
>
> Could we merge this patchset? ...
> It has been a long time to wait for Arnd's response...
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
As we are still in the merge window I won't queue anything but fixes.
Let's give Arnd another week or so to respond.
Kind rega
