Re: warning from domain_get_iommu

Hi, On 2020/2/8 18:19, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: On Sat Feb 08 20, Lu Baolu wrote: Hi Jerry, On 2020/2/7 17:34, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: On Thu Feb 06 20, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: On Tue Feb 04 20, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: I'm working on getting a system to reproduce this, and verify it also

Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Convert to a generic reset implementation

On Wed 22 Jan 03:48 PST 2020, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > Currently the QCOM specific smmu reset implementation is very > specific to SDM845 SoC and has a wait-for-safe logic which > may not be required for other SoCs. So move the SDM845 specific > logic to its specific reset function. Also add

Re: warning from domain_get_iommu

On Sat Feb 08 20, Lu Baolu wrote: Hi Jerry, On 2020/2/7 17:34, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: On Thu Feb 06 20, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: On Tue Feb 04 20, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: I'm working on getting a system to reproduce this, and verify it also occurs with 5.5, but I have a report of a case

RE: [RFC v3 2/8] vfio/type1: Make per-application (VM) PASID quota tunable

Hi Jacob, > From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 3:44 AM > To: Liu, Yi L > Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/8] vfio/type1: Make per-application (VM) PASID quota > tunable > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:11:46 -0800 > "Liu, Yi L" wrote: > > > From: Liu Yi