unctionality was updated. This adds comparable support to the other
> function where it was missing.
>
> Fixes: b3c72fc9a78e ("x86/boot: Introduce setup_indirect")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper
This is the fix. So, I think it should be tak
uot;x86/boot: Introduce setup_indirect")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper
This is the fix. So, I think it should be taken now, regardless of the
fate of the other patches in the series.
Daniel
___
iommu ma
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 01:18:22PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 04:51:51PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 08:26:54PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 04:51:51PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 08:26:54PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >
> > I am discussing with Ross the other option. We can create
> > .rodata.mle_header section and put it at fixed offset as
> > kernel_info
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:03:47AM -0400, Ross Philipson wrote:
> On 9/25/20 3:18 PM, Arvind Sankar wrote:
[...]
> > You should see them if you do
> > readelf -r arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux
> >
> > In terms of the code, things like:
> >
> > addl%ebx, (sl_gdt_desc + 2)(%ebx)
> >
>
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:54:31AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 01:20 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > On 05/10/2016 08:57 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:43:58PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> >>> Is it not possible to maintain some kind of kernel virtual address
