Re: [PATCH 09/15] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-20 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:03 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman < gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 09:50:36AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:43 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH 09/15] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-20 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Sorry, I meant to put you on the to-list for all patches. The last time I sent out this many patches using a collective cc-list for all patches I was told to reduce my cc-list. Jim On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:42 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > If you don't Cc me on the whole series I have

Re: [PATCH 09/15] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-20 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:43 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h > > index ac8e37cd716a..6cd916860b5f 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/device.h > > +++ b/include/linux/device.h

[PATCH 10/15] dma-direct: Invoke dma offset func if needed

2020-05-19 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Just like dma_pfn_offset, another offset is added to the dma/phys translation if there happen to be multiple regions that have different mapping offsets. Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan --- include/linux/dma-direct.h | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git

[PATCH 00/15] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-05-19 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
This patchset expands the usefulness of the Broadcom Settop Box PCIe controller by building upon the PCIe driver used currently by the Raspbery Pi. Other forms of this patchset were submitted by me years ago and not accepted; the major sticking point was the code required for the DMA remapping

[PATCH 09/15] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-19 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The device variable 'dma_pfn_offset' is used to do a single linear map between cpu addrs and dma addrs. The variable 'dma_map' is added to struct device to point to an array of multiple offsets which is required for some devices. Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan --- drivers/of/address.c| 50

Re: [PATCH 09/15] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-22 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Nicolas, On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:28 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Jim, > thanks for having a go at this! My two cents. > > On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 16:34 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The device variable 'dma_pfn_offset' is used to do a single > > linear map between cpu addrs and dma

Re: [PATCH v11 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-09-03 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:52 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:36:29PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > On 9/2/2020 3:38 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > [snip] > > > > Hello Nathan, > > > > > > > > Can you tell me how much memory your RPI has and if all of it is

Re: [PATCH v11 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-09-02 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:24 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I've applied this to the dma-mapping tree. > > I had to resolve a conflict in drivers/of/address.c with a recent > mainline commit. I also applied the minor tweaks Andy pointed out > plus a few more style changes. A real change is that

Re: [PATCH v11 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-09-07 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:01 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Jim, sorry I'm a little late to the party, but was on vacation. > > On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 13:32 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:52 PM Nathan Chancellor > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:36:29PM

Re: [PATCH v11 00/11] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-09-07 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:16 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:29:59AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On

Re: [PATCH v11 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-09-08 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:43 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > And because I like replying to myself so much, here is a link to the > version with the arm cleanup patch applied. Unlike the previous two > attempts this has at least survived very basic sanity testing: > >

Re: [PATCH v11 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-09-02 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:53 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:30:20PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the > > use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and > > dma addrs. It

Re: [PATCH v11 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-08-25 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Andy, On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 5:54 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:30:20PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the > > use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and > > dma

[PATCH RESEND v10 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-08-17 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of "dev->dma_pfn_offset" which was only capable of holding a single uniform offset and had no region bounds checking.

[PATCH RESEND v10 00/11] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-08-17 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. v10: Commit: "device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map,

Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-08-20 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Anday, On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:14 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 05:53:09PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the > > use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and > > dma

Re: [PATCH v11 00/11] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-08-27 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote: > >> > >> Patchset Summary: > >>Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design > >>

[PATCH v11 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-08-24 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of "dev->dma_pfn_offset" which was only capable of holding a single uniform offset and had no region bounds checking.

[PATCH v11 00/11] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-08-24 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. v11: Commit: "device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map,

Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-27 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Nicolas, On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:00 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Jim, > one thing comes to mind, there is a small test suite in drivers/of/unittest.c > (specifically of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges()) you could extend it to include > your > use cases. Sure, will check out. > > On

Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-29 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:35 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:43 AM Jim Quinlan > wrote: > > > > Hi Nicolas, > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:00 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jim, > > > one thing comes to mind, there is a small test suite in > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-05-29 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:49 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:12:39PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > v2: > > Commit: "device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets" > > o Added helper func attach_dma_pfn_offset_map() in address.c (Chistoph) > > o Helpers funcs

Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-26 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hello Andy, On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:54 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:12:48PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field in struct device 'dma_pfn_offset_map' is used to facilitate > > the use of multiple pfn offsets between cpu addrs and dma addrs. It is > >

[PATCH v2 09/14] device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets

2020-05-26 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field in struct device 'dma_pfn_offset_map' is used to facilitate the use of multiple pfn offsets between cpu addrs and dma addrs. It is similar to 'dma_pfn_offset' except that the offset chosen depends on the cpu or dma address involved. Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan ---

[PATCH v2 00/14] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-05-26 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
v2: Commit: "device core: Add ability to handle multiple dma offsets" o Added helper func attach_dma_pfn_offset_map() in address.c (Chistoph) o Helpers funcs added to __phys_to_dma() & __dma_to_phys() (Christoph) o Added warning when multiple offsets are needed and !DMA_PFN_OFFSET_MAP o

Re: [PATCH v9 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-08-03 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 1:17 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Jim, here's some comments after testing your series against RPi4. > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 16:33 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the > > use of single or

[PATCH v10 07/11] device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-08-03 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of "dev->dma_pfn_offset" which was only capable of holding a single uniform offset and had no region bounds checking.

[PATCH v10 00/11] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-08-03 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. v10: Commit: "device-mapping: Introduce DMA range map,

[PATCH v6 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-01 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of "dev->dma_pfn_offset" which was only capable of holding a single uniform offset and had no region bounds checking.

[PATCH v6 00/12] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-07-01 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. v6: Commit "device core: Introduce DMA range map": --

Re: [PATCH v7 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-09 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Christoph, I'm sending all commits to since most of them are PCI related. I don't send all patches to linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org since I've read it is overused. The --cc list is generated by get_maintainer.pl. IIRC, in a previous discussion you said you preferred NOT to get the entire

[PATCH v7 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-08 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of "dev->dma_pfn_offset" which was only capable of holding a single uniform offset and had no region bounds checking.

[PATCH v7 00/12] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-07-08 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. v7: Commit: "device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting

Re: [PATCH v6 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-06 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Andy, Sorry for the delay in response. I will do what you suggest in your email. I do have one response to one of your comments below. On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 4:43 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:21:38PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field 'dma_range_map' in

[PATCH v8 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-15 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of "dev->dma_pfn_offset" which was only capable of holding a single uniform offset and had no region bounds checking.

[PATCH v8 00/12] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-07-15 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. v8: Commit: "device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting

Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-17 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:00 AM Robin Murphy wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Thanks for taking this on! Hi Robin, > > On 2020-06-16 21:55, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field in struct device 'dma_pfn_offset_map' is used to facilitate > > the use of single or multiple pfn offsets between cpu addrs and

[PATCH v5 08/12] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-16 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field in struct device 'dma_pfn_offset_map' is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple pfn offsets between cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of dev->dma_pfn_offset -- a uniform offset. The function of_dma_get_range() has been modified to take two additional arguments:

[PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-06-16 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. v5: Commit "device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets" -- in of/address.c: "map_size = 0" =>

Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-04 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:20 AM Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:48:49AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > > + r = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(struct dma_pfn_offset_region), > > > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > > > > > Use:r = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*r),

Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-04 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Andy, On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:05 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:35:12AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:53 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 15:20 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > ... > > > > > + phys =

Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-04 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:53 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 15:20 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field in struct device 'dma_pfn_offset_map' is used to facilitate > > the use of multiple pfn offsets between cpu addrs and dma addrs. It > > subsumes

Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-04 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Dan, On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 7:06 AM Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:20:41PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > @@ -786,7 +787,7 @@ static int sun4i_backend_bind(struct device *dev, > > struct device *master, > > const struct sun4i_backend_quirks *quirks; > > struct

[PATCH v4 08/12] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-05 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field in struct device 'dma_pfn_offset_map' is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple pfn offsets between cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of dev->dma_pfn_offset -- a uniform offset. The function of_dma_get_range() has been modified to take two additional arguments:

[PATCH v4 00/12] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-06-05 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
v4: Commit "device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets" -- of_dma_get_range() does not take a dev param but instead takes two "out" params: map and map_size. We do this so that the code that parses dma-ranges is separate from the code that modifies 'dev'. (Nicolas)

Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-05 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:27 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > a question arouse, is there a real value to dealing with PFNs (as opposed to > real addresses) in the core DMA code/structures? I see that in some cases it > eases interacting with mm, but the overwhelming usage of

Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-08 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Andy, On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 12:500f9bfe0fb8840b268af1bbcc51f1cd440514e PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:26:48PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field in struct device 'dma_pfn_offset_map' is used to facilitate > > the use of single or multiple pfn offsets

Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-09 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Andy, On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:18 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:48:51AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 12:500f9bfe0fb8840b268af1bbcc51f1cd440514e PM > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:26:48PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:

[PATCH v3 09/13] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-03 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field in struct device 'dma_pfn_offset_map' is used to facilitate the use of multiple pfn offsets between cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of dev->dma_pfn_offset -- a uniform offset -- and designates the single offset a special case. of_dma_configure() is the typical manner

[PATCH v3 00/13] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-06-03 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
v3: Commit "device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets" Commit "arm: dma-mapping: Invoke dma offset func if needed" -- The above two commits have been squashed. More importantly, the code has been modified so that the functionality for multiple pfn offsets subsumes the use of

Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] device core: Introduce multiple dma pfn offsets

2020-06-04 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Nicolas, On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:52 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 10:35 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > [...] > > > > > --- a/arch/sh/kernel/dma-coherent.c > > > > +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/dma-coherent.c > > > > @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ void

Re: [PATCH v8 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-22 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:51 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:35:11AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the > > use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and > > dma addrs. It

[PATCH v9 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-24 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and dma addrs. It subsumes the role of "dev->dma_pfn_offset" which was only capable of holding a single uniform offset and had no region bounds checking.

[PATCH v9 00/12] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips

2020-07-24 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. NOTE: ChristophH wanted the dma_set_offset_range() function

Re: [PATCH v9 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-28 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
Hi Christoph, On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:33 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > A few tiny nitpicks: > > The subject should have the dma-mapping prefix, this doesn't > really touch the device core. > > > - rc = of_dma_get_range(np, _addr, , ); > > + rc = of_dma_get_range(np, ); > > + rc =

Re: [PATCH v9 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-28 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:05 AM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:45 PM Jim Quinlan > wrote: > > > > The new field 'dma_range_map' in struct device is used to facilitate the > > use of single or multiple offsets between mapping regions of cpu addrs and > > dma addrs. It

Re: [PATCH v9 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-29 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 2:19 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:24:51PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > I started using devm_kcalloc() but at least two reviewers convinced me > > to just use kcalloc(). In addition, when I was using devm_kcalloc() > > it was awkward because

Re: [PATCH v9 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-30 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:28 AM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:19 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:24:51PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > I started using devm_kcalloc() but at least two reviewers convinced me > > > to just use kcalloc(). In

Re: [PATCH v9 08/12] device core: Introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset

2020-07-30 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:05 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 16:33 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > static void __init of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges(void) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c > > b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c > >

Re: can we switch bmips to the generic dma ranges code

2020-11-03 Thread Jim Quinlan via iommu
I'll get on it. Jim On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:42 PM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > On 11/3/2020 2:15 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi Florian and others, > > > > now that the generic DMA ranges code landed, can we switch bmips over > > to it instead of duplicating the logic? > > This should