On 15.06.2016 14:25, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:10:08PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Between acquiring the this_cpu_ptr() and using it, ideally we don't want
>> to be preempted and work on another CPU's private data. this_cpu_ptr()
>> checks whether or not preemption is
[TLDR: I'm adding the regression report below to regzbot, the Linux
kernel regression tracking bot; all text you find below is compiled from
a few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already already
from similar mails.]
Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. Sending this
On 25.03.22 08:12, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> On čtvrtek 24. března 2022 18:07:29 CET Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Right, but is that sync_for_device call really needed? AFAICT, that
>> ath9k_hw_process_rxdesc_edma() invocation doesn't actually modify any of
>> the data when it returns
TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for
regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually
contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter.
#regzbot fixed-by: 4fe87e818ea492ade079cc0
On 31.03.22 08:51, Thorsten Leemhuis
