Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal

2021-02-19 Thread Al Stone
On 19 Feb 2021 12:24, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 04:39:43PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > > As of today, the proposal has been approved for inclusion in the next > > release of the ACPI spec (whatever version gets released post the 6.4 > > versi

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal

2021-02-18 Thread Al Stone
On 17 Feb 2021 10:37, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 02:31:03PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > > Would you believe last week's meeting was canceled, too? Not sure > > why the chair/co-chair are doing this but I'm finding it a little > > frustrating. >

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal

2021-02-16 Thread Al Stone
On 04 Feb 2021 13:25, Al Stone wrote: > On 03 Feb 2021 09:46, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > > > On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > > Hi Al, > > > > > > > > On

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal

2021-02-04 Thread Al Stone
On 03 Feb 2021 09:46, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > > On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > Hi Al, > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal

2021-02-02 Thread Al Stone
On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > > > I updated the doc: https://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/viot/viot-v9.pdf > > > You can incorporate it into the ASWG proposal. > > > C

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal

2020-12-04 Thread Al Stone
On 04 Dec 2020 19:09, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:01:27PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > > On 03 Dec 2020 22:21, Yinghan Yang wrote: > > > Hi Jean, > > > > > > I'm sorry for the delayed response. I think the new "

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal

2020-12-03 Thread Al Stone
nd], and if its BDF is in [BPF start, BDF end]. Its endpoint ID will > be: > > ((Segment - Segment start) << 16) + BDF - BDF start + Endpoint start > > Does that sound OK? > > Thanks, > Jean > -- ciao, al --- Al Stone Sof

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology

2020-11-04 Thread Al Stone
On 04 Nov 2020 10:33, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:09:04PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: > > So, there are some questions about the VIOT definition and I just > > don't know enough to be able to answer them. One of the ASWG members > &

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology

2020-11-03 Thread Al Stone
On 06 Oct 2020 17:23, Auger Eric wrote: > Hello Al, > > On 10/2/20 8:23 PM, Al Stone wrote: > > On 24 Sep 2020 11:54, Auger Eric wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Adding Al in the loop > >> > >> On 9/24/20 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology

2020-10-02 Thread Al Stone
s pretty low, and that it has been thought out pretty well already. ASWG's consideration will therefore start from the assumption that it would be best _not_ to make changes. So, I'll let you know what happens next week. > > > > > Not that I know, but I don't see why it's a must. >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology

2020-09-29 Thread Al Stone
very slim, but stranger things have happened. Most likely, once approved it would be in ACPI 6.5, sometime in 2021. I'll post the link to the submittal as soon as I can. Again, my apologies for the delays; approval in the spec can proceed pretty much independent of the implementation, a